Research Article Caristi Fixed Point Theorem in Metric Spaces with a Graph M. R. Alfuraidan 1 and M. A. Khamsi 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Mathematical Science, e University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA Correspondence should be addressed to M. R. Alfuraidan; monther@kfupm.edu.sa Received 27 January 2014; Accepted 11 February 2014; Published 13 March 2014 Academic Editor: Qamrul Hasan Ansari Copyright © 2014 M. R. Alfuraidan and M. A. Khamsi. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We discuss Caristi’s fixed point theorem for mappings defined on a metric space endowed with a graph. is work should be seen as a generalization of the classical Caristi’s fixed point theorem. It extends some recent works on the extension of Banach contraction principle to metric spaces with graph. Dedicated to Rashed Saleh Alfuraidan and Prof. Miodrag Mateljevi’c for his 65th birthday 1. Introduction is work was motivated by some recent works on the extension of Banach contraction principle to metric spaces with a partial order [1] or a graph [2]. Caristi’s fixed point theorem is maybe one of the most beautiful extensions of Banach contraction principle [3, 4]. Recall that this theorem states the fact that any map :→ has a fixed point provided that is a complete metric space and there exists a lower semicontinuous map  :  → [0, +∞) such that  (, ) ≤  () −  () , (1) for every ∈. Recall that ∈ is called a fixed point of if () = . is general fixed point theorem has found many applications in nonlinear analysis. It is shown, for example, that this theorem yields essentially all the known inwardness results [5] of geometric fixed point theory in Banach spaces. Recall that inwardness conditions are the ones which assert that, in some sense, points from the domain are mapped toward the domain. Possibly, the weakest of the inwardness conditions, the Leray-Schauder boundary condition, is the assumption that a map points of  anywhere except to the outward part of the ray originating at some interior point of and passing through . e proofs given to Caristi’s result vary and use different techniques (see [3, 68]). It is worth to mention that because of Caristi’s result of close connection to the Ekeland’s [9] variational principle, many authors refer to it as Caristi- Ekeland fixed point result. For more on Ekeland’s variational principle and the equivalence between Caristi-Ekeland fixed point result and the completeness of metric spaces, the reader is advised to read [10]. 2. Main Results Maybe one of the most interesting examples of the use of metric fixed point theorems is the proof of the existence of solutions to differential equations. e general approach is to convert such equations to integral equations which describes exactly a fixed point of a mapping. e metric spaces in which such mapping acts are usually a function space. Putting a norm (in the case of a vector space) or a distance gives us a metric structure rich enough to use the Banach contraction principle or other known fixed point theorems. But one structure naturally enjoyed by such function spaces is rarely used. Indeed we have an order on the functions inherited from the order of R. In the classical use of Banach contraction principle, the focus is on the metric behavior of the mapping. e connection with the natural order is usually ignored. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2014, Article ID 303484, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/303484