Analytica Chimica Acta 461 (2002) 75–84
Relative performance of immunochemical (enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture
detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated
biphenyls in mussel tissues
Gilberto Fillmann
a,b,c,∗
, Tamara S. Galloway
c
, Ross C. Sanger
c
,
Michael H. Depledge
c
, James W. Readman
b
a
Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, C.P. 474, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil, 96201-900
b
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK
c
Plymouth Environmental Research Centre, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
Received 22 October 2001; received in revised form 12 February 2002; accepted 14 March 2002
Abstract
Results from polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) analyses of mussel tissue extracts by immunoassay (PCB RaPID Assay
®
)
and conventional gas chromatography–electron-capture detection (GC–ECD) are described and compared. Mussels from
natural populations with diverse concentrations of PCBs, mussel tissue fortified with technical Aroclor
®
1254 and a certified
reference material are included.
A strong correlation is reported between “total” PCBs quantified by both techniques (r
2
= 0.95, n = 27). Immunoassay
results, however, exhibited lower values compared to GC–ECD, particularly when GC results are corrected for procedural
recovery. A reduced antibody response, due to differences in the congener composition between the mussel extracts and
Aroclor
®
1254 (used to raise and calibrate the ELISA), provides the most likely explanation for this difference. Non-parametric
statistical analyses confirmed that, although differing from Aroclor
®
1254, PCB congener compositions in the mussel extracts
most closely resemble that of Aroclor
®
1254. At very high PCB concentrations (>30 gg
−1
dry weight), however, ELISA
results are statistically different (P< 0.01) from GC–ECD results, which is likely to be related to the solvation capacity of
ELISA diluent. Similarity analysis showed high correlations between the most prominent congeners in Aroclor
®
1254 and
immunoassay results. This analysis did not, however, identify a specific chlorine substitution pattern to which the immunoassay
preferentially responded.
Whilst GC–ECD affords the capability to quantify individual congeners of different reactivity and toxicity, the data reported
do indicate that immunoassay offers a rapid and inexpensive alternative method for estimation of “total” PCBs at environ-
mentally significant levels. It is, however, necessary to remove extraneous lipids to reduce matrix effects in the immunoassay.
© 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Immunoassay; ELISA; PCBs; Mussel; GC–ECD; Methodology
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: docgfill@super.furg.br (G. Fillmann).
0003-2670/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII:S0003-2670(02)00233-7