Single-stage approach for the management of
choledocolithiasis with concomitant cholelithiasis.
Implementation of a protocol in a secondary
hospital
Robert Memba
a,b,d,*
, Sergio Gonz
alez
a
, Daniel Coronado
a
,
Ver
onica Gonz
alez
a
, Fernando Mata
a
, Jos
e Antonio Rodrı´guez
a
,
Carlos Mu¨ hlenberg
a
, Joan Sala
a
, Ruth Ribas
a
, Eva Pueyo
a
,
Alfredo Mata
c
, Donal B. O'Connor
b
, Kevin C. Conlon
b
, Rosa Jorba
d
a
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Sant Joan Despı´-Moises Broggi Hospital,
Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
b
Professorial Surgical Unit, Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
c
Gastroenterologist Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Sant Joan Despı´-Moises Broggi Hospital,
Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
d
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Joan XXIII University Hospital,
Tarragona, Spain
article info
Article history:
Received 11 July 2018
Received in revised form
14 November 2018
Accepted 18 December 2018
Available online xxx
Keywords:
Common bile duct stones
Choledocholithiasis
Single-stage treatment
One-step treatment
Transcystic approach
Choledochotomy
abstract
Background: Current evidence shows that single-stage treatment of concomitant chol-
edocholithiasis and cholelithiasis is as effective and safe as two-stage treatment. However,
several studies suggest that single-stage approach requires shorter hospitalization time
and is more cost-effective than the two-stage approach, even though it requires consid-
erable training. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of a protocol for man-
aging concomitant choledocholithiasis and cholelithiasis using single-stage treatment.
Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis and chol-
edocholithiasis who were treated with the single-stage treatment e transcystic instru-
mentation, choledocotomy or intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-
creatography (ERCP) e between September 2010 and June 2017 was assessed. The primary
outcomes were complications, hospital stay, operative time and recurrence rate.
Results: 164 patients were enrolled. 141 (86%) were operated laparoscopically. Preoperatively
diagnosed stones were not found by intraoperative imaging or disappeared after “flushing”
in 38 patients (23.2%). Surgical approach was transcystic in 45 patients (27.41%), chol-
edochotomy in 74 (45.1%), intraoperative ERCP in 4 (2.4%), and bilioenteric derivation in 3
(1.8%). Mean hospitalization stay was 4.4 days. Mean operative time was 166 min 27 patients
(16.5%) had complications and 1 patient was exitus (0.6%). Recurrence rate was 1.2%.
Conclusions: Single-stage approach is a safe and effective management option for
concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocolithiasis. Furthermore, a significant number of
common bile duct stones pass spontaneously to duodenum or can benefit from a trans-
cystic approach, with presumable low morbidity and cost-efficiency.
© 2019 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. Dr Mallafr e Guasch 4, Tarragona, 43005, Spain.
E-mail address: rmembai.hj23.ics@gencat.cat (R. Memba).
the surgeon xxx (xxxx) xxx
Please cite this article as: Memba R et al., Single-stage approach for the management of choledocolithiasis with concomitant choleli-
thiasis. Implementation of a protocol in a secondary hospital, The Surgeon, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2018.12.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2018.12.001
1479-666X/© 2019 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.
Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.