Research Article
Comparison of Auto- and Fixed-Continuous Positive Airway
PressureonAirLeakinPatientswithObstructiveSleepApnea:
DatafromaRandomizedControlledTrial
MariusLebret ,
1,2
Marie-Caroline Rotty,
3,4
CyrilArgento,
2
Jean-Louis Pepin,
1,5
Renaud Tamisier ,
1,5
FrançoisArbib,
6
DanyJaffuel,
4,7,8
NicolasMolinari,
3,9
andJean-ChristianBorel
1,2,5
1
HP2, INSERM U1042, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
2
AGIR ` a dom. Association, Meylan, France
3
IMAG, CNRS, Montpellier University, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
4
APARD Groupe Ad`ene, Montpellier, France
5
Sleep Laboratory, orax and Vessels Division, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
6
Cabinet de Pneumologie,
´
Echirolles, France
7
Department of Respiratory Diseases, Montpellier University Hospital, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
8
Pulmonary Disorders and Respiratory Sleep Disorders Unit, Polyclinic Saint-Privat, Boujan sur Libron, France
9
Department of Medical Information, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
Correspondence should be addressed to Marius Lebret; mariuslebret@gmail.com
Received 13 April 2019; Revised 23 June 2019; Accepted 10 July 2019; Published 7 August 2019
Academic Editor: Alice M. Turner
Copyright © 2019 Marius Lebret et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Auto-CPAP may cause sleep fragmentation due to variations in pressure and unintentional leaks. e aim of this study was to
compare air leak between fixed-CPAP and auto-CPAP after 4 months of CPAP treatment. is study is an ancillary analysis of a
randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled trial over 4 months, comparing fixed- and auto-CPAP in newly diagnosed patients
with OSA. e following data were extracted from the CPAP devices: mean and 90th percentile pressure, residual apnea-hypopnea
index, mean CPAP use, and amount of leak. Within each arm, patients were also randomly allocated to use of one of the three
different brands of devices. Since the leak was reported differently for each device, median leak value was determined for each
brand and leaks were classified as “above the median” or “below the median”. Data from 269 patients were analyzed. e
univariate analysis showed that tobacco consumption, CPAP level, and oronasal masks were associated with leaks above the
median value but not the type of CPAP. e multivariate analysis showed that only CPAP level and oronasal masks were
associated with leaks below the median. ere were no differences in the types of mask used between fixed- and auto-CPAP. ere
was no impact of the type of CPAP on leaks or the type of interface used. We used a method based on the median leak value to
standardize comparisons across devices which report leaks with different definitions.
1.Introduction
CPAP is the first-line treatment for moderate to severe
obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome [1, 2]. e most
frequently reported side effect of CPAP is leaks [3, 4] that
cause annoyances such as mouth dryness and nose con-
gestion [5, 6]. e etiology of leaks is multifactorial [7], and
over the past decades, manufacturers have striven to im-
prove interfaces and CPAP algorithms in order to attenuate
leaks and reduce mean pressures during sleep. Autoad-
justing CPAP is an important technological advancement
that adapts the positive pressure applied according to re-
sidual obstructive respiratory events (flow limitation or
hypopnea/apnea) that are constantly detected by the device.
Hindawi
Canadian Respiratory Journal
Volume 2019, Article ID 6310956, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6310956