1 To appear in Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Human Relations, Springer The Credit View and AI Testimony: A Cross-Cultural Epistemological Study of Human and AI Testimony Masaharu Mizumoto Shane Ryan Chienkuo Mi 1. Introduction In this work, we revisit Jennifer Lackey’s “Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know”. We also look forward to an emerging debate about what we call AI epistemology. Lackey’s work introduced the Chicago Visitor Case and challenged virtue reliabilists’ credit view of knowledge. Since then, the Chicago Visit Case has become the paradigm case of, or at least one of the most prominent cases of, testimonial knowledge in the social epistemology literature. Furthermore, the case, and Lackey’s discussion there, have supported strong criticism of virtue reliabilist accounts of knowledge and encouraged significant adjustments to those accounts. We revisit her case by empirically investigating whether non-experts agree that it is a case of testimonial knowledge and whether there are any significant cultural differences in the answers of participants. In addition to contributing to our understanding of the testimonial knowledge discussion, our studies here also aim to contribute to our emerging and much-needed knowledge of AI epistemology. Using a variant of the Chicago Visitor Case, here we try to provide initial data for the development of accounts of AI epistemology. What is more, while there is of course an interest among epistemologists with regard to how to