This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 12 th International Manikin and Modelling Meeting 2931 August 2018, St. Gallen, Switzerland Measuring spatial and temporal changes in garment sweat absorption: comparison of gravimetric and infrared methods DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1404606 Margherita Raccuglia 1,2 , Christian Heyde 2 , Alex Lloyd 1 , Simon Hodder 1 and George Havenith 1 1 Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, UK 2 Adidas FUTURE Sport Science Team, Herzogenaurach, Germany Introduction Temperature and moisture management in clothing is a main focus of the clothing industry with regards to garment performance optimisation and wear discomfort reduction. Building on our laboratory’s work on mapping sweat production distribution across the body [13], the aim of the present study was to obtain detailed spatial maps showing how this sweat migrates into the clothing during physical work in a single clothing layer. Currently, the only direct method available to quantify local garment sweat absorption and distribution is a ‘destructive’ gravimetric method developed in the current study. While this currently is the only methodology that permits direct and analytical measurements of garment regional sweat absorption, the latter approach is timeconsuming and expensive, therefore of limited applicability. As such, the second goal of this study was to assess whether infrared thermography (IRT) could be used as an indirect method to estimate garment regional sweat content in a quick and ‘nondestructive’ fashion. We assumed that garment zones characterised by higher sweat retention would be affected by higher evaporative cooling, resulting in bigger local temperature drops from their dry state. Therefore, a relation between the amount of moisture absorbed and the temperature drop of wet textile areas was expected. Method Eight male runners were recruited for this study. A short sleeved, 100% cotton TShirt was used. Sweat absorption and temperature across the TShirt were mapped over a total running time of 50min. As a ‘destructive’ gravimetric method was adopted to quantify regional sweat absorption, each participant performed 10 running trials on a treadmill, characterised by different durations (550 min, 5 min increments). Immediately after each partial running trial, the Tshirt was removed from the body, fitted to a TShirtlike shape stand and image acquisition was performed. This was done to cancelout the impact of regional differences in participants’ skin temperature which could have affected garment’s temperature. After performing image acquisition, the TShirt was dissected into 21 different regions of interest (Figure 1). Using a gravimetric approach (wet weight – dry weight) the timecourse and distribution of sweat absorption of each garment was defined. The same 21 garment regions were examined to extrapolate regional temperature data from each infrared picture. As in dry state the temperature of the TShirt by definition equals ambient temperature, the temperature of each garment region was considered as temperature drop from ambient temperature.