N.A.B.U. 2012 n o 2 (juin) – – 44 2) Cfr. Ibid., p. 32. 3) Cfr. Sjöberg, Å. W. (1970-1971), Hymns to Meslamtaea, Lugalgirra and Nanna-Suen in Honour of King Ibbīsuen (Ibbīsn) of Ur, OrSu 19-20, pp. 159-160. 4) Cooper, J. S. (op. cit.), p. 122. 5) Ibid., p. 129. 6) For the use of locative to indicate the material s. Jagersma B. (2010), A Descriptive Grammar of Sumerian, PhD Dissertation, Universiteit Leiden, p. 176. Maurizio VIANO, <maurizioviano@libero.it> Via Agnesi 24, 18100 IMPERIA (IM), ITALY 32) Louvre Gilgamesh (AO 19862) is depicted in life size *) — The colossal human figure grasping a lion from the exterior faade of Sargon’s throne room in Khorsabad has long been suspected to represent Gilgamesh. However, there is no inscription on the sculpture, and the identification has remained unsure. One important detail has so far escaped the notice of scholars, namely the height of the sculpted figure (ca 5,5 m) and its exact correspondence to the data given about the tallness of the hero in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh was said to be 11 cubits tall, as was first known from the Hittite version of the epic – 11 AM-MA-TUM (KUB 8.57.I, line 8). 1) A recently published Ugaritic version also agrees with that – 11 i-na am-ma-ti la-an-š (RS 94.2006, line 34). 2) The Ugaritic version helped A. R. George to reconstruct the line I 52 in the Standard Babylonian version from the manuscripts g and h as follows: [x x x x l]a-na ⸢11 ina⸣ ammati(1.kš)[la-an-š], which he translates [A giant(?)] in stature, eleven cubits [was his height]. 3) The height of the Khorsabad giant AO 19862 is given as 5.52 m. on the Muse du Louvre webpage, although according to another source it is a little shorter, 5.45 m. 4) I don’t know the origin of this 7 cm. difference, but both figures match the data of the epic that Gilgamesh was 11 cubits tall. The cubit of 30 fingers is ca. 50 cm, standard from Pre-Sargonic through Old Babylonian times, later also called the big cubit. 5) There are other details about measures of the body of Gilgamesh in the epic that can be controlled from this relief. The Hittite version gives the breadth of his shoulders with the number 9, but the length unit is broken away from the tablet. 6) The Ugaritic version reads: 4 i-na am-ma-tim bi-rt tu-le-š four cubits is the width of his chest (lines 34-5), which is the only passage attesting to this figure, because from the manuscripts with Standard Babylonian version, only bi-rit is legible so far from the line (SB I 53, ms g). 7) The Louvre Gilgamesh seems to have a little more than three cubits as the width of his chest, measured from a two-dimensional photograph. However, nobody knows how exactly the birit tulê was measured in ancient Mesopotamia. If one has to start the measure from the point where the curvatures of hero’s figure emerge from the stone slab, four cubits may be the actual width of his chest on this relief. The next line of the epic describes the length of his feet – three cubits from the sole of the foot to the knee and six cubits all together. The Ugaritic version reads: ni-ks GR.2-šu  qa-na pu-ri-du-šu (line 36) and SB I 56: NG.KA 9 GR-š ½ nindan p[u-ri-is-su] (ms. d 1 ). 8) This information accords well with the Louvre relief, in which there are three cubits from the ground to the knee of the hero and the full length of his purīdu is exactly 6 cubits. It is only natural that a stride of this giant must have been about 3 metres, that is 6 cubits long, as we are informed by SB I 57. 9) Subsequently, line SB I 58 specifies the extent of a-š-rit-ti š[ le]-te-š, which is probably from the topmost part of the bearded area on the cheeks to the bottom end of his beard. This extent can be measured as two cubits from a photograph, accordingly the restoration of the full line should be [2 K]Š a-š-rit-ti š[ le]-te-š. 10) There was another very similar figure nearby in Sargon’s palace, also grasping a lion in his left arm and holding a sickle sword in his right hand (AO 19861). These two colossal human figures form a part of an elaborate heraldic motif, which P. Albenda designates the grand royal emblem, consisting of two winged human-headed bulls moving in opposite directions and flanking a hero grasping a lion, all of which are depicted with frontal faces. It was set up in two known areas of Sargon’s palace which stood on the high mound; namely, on the terrace wall fronting the palace [AO 19861] and on the northeast wall in faade n [AO 19862]. 11) The figure in the relief AO 19861 is shorter than that of AO 19862, it’s height being about 4,70 m. 12) It is tempting to assume that the other colossal figure represents Enkidu. The Epic of Gilgamesh does not give the exact physical measures of Enkidu, but in several versions it is said that he is like Gilgamesh in figure, though shorter in height he is strong in body. 13) Thus Enkidu is shorter than Gilgamesh, but this is compensated for with a sturdier physique. If AO 19861 depicts Enkidu in life size as AO 19862 does with Gilgamesh, then he may have been thought to be about 9,5 cubits tall. Another visible clue for AO 19861’s identification with Enkidu is his curly hair, in accordance with SB I 107. The lions in the grip of the heroes have been considered to be small lions in proportion to the human bodies holding them. However, both lions’ bodies measure about 3 cubits or 1,5 metres, which is the natural size of an adult lion. Accordingly, one does not have to see the lions as diminutive, as they are also depicted life size.