Journal of Membrane Science 280 (2006) 651–658
Pervaporation performance of crosslinked polyethylene glycol
membranes for deep desulfurization of FCC gasoline
Ligang Lin, Gang Wang, Huimin Qu, Jinrong Yang, Yunfang Wang, Deqing Shi, Ying Kong
∗
State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (East China), Dongying 257061, PR China
Received 12 December 2005; received in revised form 21 February 2006; accepted 21 February 2006
Available online 29 March 2006
Abstract
An crosslinked polyethylene glycol (PEG) membrane was prepared for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) gasoline desulfurization. Sulfur enrichment
factor come to 4.75 and 3.51 for typical FCC gasoline feed with sulfur content of 238.28 and 1227.24 g/g, respectively. Pervaporation performance
of membranes kept stable within the long time run of 500 h, which indicated that crosslinked PEG membranes had the property of resisting
pollution. Judging from chromatographic analysis, the membranes were more efficient for thiophene species. Effects of operation conditions
including permeate pressure, feed temperature, feed flow rate and feed sulfur content level on the pervaporation performance were investigated.
Permeation flux decreased with increasing permeate pressure while increased with the operating temperature increase. Sulfur enrichment factor
increased firstly and decreased then when permeate pressure and temperature rose. The peak value occurred at 10.5 mm Hg and 358 K for model
compounds feed (378 K for FCC gasoline feed). Arrhenius relationship existed between flux and operating temperature. Both sulfur enrichment
factor and flux were shown to increase with increasing feed flow rate. Permeation flux increased while sulfur enrichment factor decreased as the
feed sulfur content increased, but the influence of increasing sulfur content on pervaporation performance weakened when sulfur content come to
600 g/g.
© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Pervaporation; FCC gasoline; Deep desulfurization; PEG; Sulfur
1. Introduction
Environmental concerns have resulted in legislation which
places limits on the sulfur content of gasoline. In the European
Union, for instance, a maximum sulfur level of gasoline has been
restricted to 50 ppm by the year of 2005. Sulfur in gasoline is a
direct contributor of SO
X
emissions [1,2]. FCC gasoline is major
source of sulfur and contributes heavy amount of the gasoline
pool, especially in China. National standard of China for sulfur
content of gasoline is 800 g/g, which is far higher than devel-
oped countries. Technical development for deep desulfurization
of FCC gasoline is urgent and attracting increasing attention.
A number of solutions have been suggested to reduce sulfur
in gasoline, but none of them proven to be ideal. Since sul-
fur in the FCC feed is the prime contributor of sulfur level in
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 546 8391029/13706364264;
fax: +86 546 8391971.
E-mail addresses: kongy@hdpu.edu.cn, yingkong@sohu.com (Y. Kong).
FCC gasoline, an obvious approach is hydrotreating the feed.
While hydrotreating allows the sulfur content in gasoline to be
reduced to any desired level, installing or adding the necessary
hydrotreating capacity requires a substantial capital expendi-
ture and increased operating costs. Further, alkene and cyclic
alkane are susceptible to hydrogenation during hydrotreating.
This leads to a significant loss in octane number since alkene
and cyclic alkane mean higher octane number than paraffin.
Application of membrane technology in petrochemical field
provides a newly efficient approach for the separation of organic
mixture and has gained increasing attention of membrane and
petrochemical field. Gasoline desulfurization by membrane pro-
cess is newly emerged technology. It is an incorporate process
of pervaporation and vapor permeation. The process involves
contacting a gasoline feed with a membrane having sufficient
flux and selectivity to separate a sulfur deficient retentate frac-
tion from a sulfur enriched permeate fraction. Sulfur deficient
retentate fractions are useful directly into the gasoline pool.
Sulfur enriched permeate fractions need further treatment by
conventional process. Membrane processing offers a number
0376-7388/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.022