Eagly AH and Chaiken S (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Eagly AH and Chaiken S (1998) Attitude structure and function. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST and Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 269±322. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Fazio RH (1990) Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework.In:ZannaMP(ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 23, pp. 75±109. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Festinger L (1954) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Fishbein M and Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Greenwald AG and Banaji MR (1995) Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102: 4±27. Katz D (1960) The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163±204. McGuire WJ (1964) Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches. In: Berkowitz L (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 191±229. New York, NY: Academic Press. Osgood CE, Suci GJ and Tannenbaum PH (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Petty RE and Cacioppo JT (1986) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 123±205. New York, NY: Academic Press. Petty RE and Krosnick JA (eds) (1995) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Petty RE and Wegner DT (1998) Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST and Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 323±390. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Schwarz N (1999) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist 54: 93±105. Zimbardo PG and Leippe MR (1991) The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Intermediate article Attractor Networks Garrison W Cottrell, University of California, San Diego, California, USA Attractor networks are types of neural network that are often used to represent human subjects' con- tent-addressable memory. That is, given part of a memory, such as a name, we can complete the pattern and recall other information about the indi- vidual associated with that name. INTRODUCTION: COGNITION AS ACTIVATION DYNAMICS How is it we recall information? Many psycho- logists have suggested that our memory is red- integrative ±thatis,we`re-integrate'theinformation each time we recall something. The correlate in computer science is called content-addressable memory (CAM). Standard retrieval of information from a computer's memory requires an address, the location of the information. One can, however, buy an expensive piece of hardware that will retrieve the bits at any address in the memory that match a partial pattern of bits; i.e., based on the content of that memory. What is expensive to a computer scientistseemseffortlessforahuman.Forexample, I can tell you I am thinking of someone who is a former actor, a former President of the United States, a Republican, quite elderly, and a Rhodes scholar. You probably retrieved `Ronald Reagan', even though part of the description is incorrect. You retrieved this memory through pattern comple- tion: given part of the memory, you retrieved the rest of the memory. CONTENTS Introduction: cognition as activation dynamics Hopfield networks Energy functions and convergence Boltzmann machines Sequential attractors: backpropagation through time Phase-space learning Conclusion Attractor Networks 253