ABSTRACT Despite robust rationales for using an inquiry-based pedagogy in university and college-level science courses, it is conspicuously absent from many of today's classrooms. Inquiry-based learning is crucial for developing critical-thinking skills, honing scientific problem solving ability, and developing scientific content knowledge. Inquiry-based pedagogy provides students with opportunities to participate and practice the activities involved in science. There are a number of dimensions that are integral to the creation of an inquiry-based learning environment that are applicable to the geological sciences. We considered these dimensions in the design of an inquiry-based undergraduate geology course and collected quantitative and qualitative data that documents the successful implementation of this redesigned course. Our findings show that when appropriately structured, inquiry-based learning can help students develop critical scientific-inquiry skills, suggesting that inquiry-based learning is essential for teaching geology at the university or college level. With the proper alignment of course objectives, content, pedagogical design, tasks, assessment strategies, and instructor and student roles, geoscience instructors at the university or college level can create inquiry-based learning environments in which students are able to successfully develop skills in scientific inquiry as well as geological content knowledge. INTEGRATING INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING INTO UNDERGRADUATE GEOLOGY [G]eology is both a body of knowledge and a way of thinking and doing things. That is, there are things that we do operationally as well as things we know. Often in undergraduate education there is a tendency to emphasize the knowledge but not the way of thinking and doing. (Buchwald, 1997, p. 327) Blueprint for Change: A Report from The National Conference on the Revolution in Earth and Space Science Education (Barstow and Geary, 2002) details a new vision for teaching and learning in the earth sciences. Blueprint for Change advocates adopting a 'science-as-a-verb' perspective that emphasizes the human elements (e.g., successes, failures and emotional dispositions) that are associated with engaging in science as inquiry (Yore et al., 2002). This is in direct opposition to the 'science-as-a-noun' perspective, which stresses textbook knowledge, lists and procedures about scientific processes. Geoscience education should help students develop thinking skills such as inquiry, visual literacy, understanding of systems and models, and the ability to apply knowledge and problem solving to a range of substantive, real-world issues (Barstow and Geary, 2002). To accomplish such goals, Blueprint for Change recommends that science educators use inquiry-based learning and visualization technologies in the classroom, laboratories, and other environments to promote understanding of the earth as a system of processes. The purpose of this paper is to provide practical guidelines to instructors of undergraduate geoscience courses who wish to integrate inquiry-based learning into their teaching. We begin with an overview of inquiry-based learning, followed by a framework that can be used to design a course or laboratory that incorporates inquiry-based learning. Lastly, we describe a specific case of integrating inquiry-based learning into an undergraduate geology course as well as the results and lessons learned from the experience. BACKGROUND Inquiry-based Learning and Teaching - The use of inquiry-based learning has received much attention since the National Research Council (NRC) released the National Science Education Standards (NSES) (NRC, 1996) for K-12 education. Inquiry-based learning refers to the activities of students and how they develop understanding of scientific ideas and how scientists study the natural world (NRC, 1996). Using inquiry in the classroom as an instructional method can help students achieve understanding of scientific concepts by having students practice and participate in the activities typical of a working scientist. When students are engaged in inquiry-based learning they should (NRC, 2000): (a) be engaged in scientifically-oriented questions; (b) give priority to evidence, allowing them to develop and evaluate explanations that address scientific questions; (c) formulate explanations from evidence to address scientific questions; (d) evaluate their explanations in light of alternative explanations, particularly those that reflect scientific understanding and evidence; and (e) communicate and justify their proposed explanations. These five elements are essential characteristics of an inquiry-based learning environment. A number of studies have reported the benefits of inquiry-related teaching approaches, suggesting that these techniques foster students' understanding of scientific processes, scientific literacy, and critical thinking (Cavallo et al., 2004; Glasson and McKenzie, 1998; Haury, 1993) among other competencies. Inquiry-based teaching can also improve students' understanding of the scientific method and its strengths and weaknesses (Keller et. al., 2000). These and other studies imply that the use of inquiry-based learning is an effective approach for teaching science at all levels ranging from K-12 through undergraduate education (NRC, 2000). There are a number of undergraduate geoscience educators that have utilized inquiry-based teaching methods in their courses (Keller et al., 2000), but integrating inquiry-based learning activities can be challenging. For undergraduate geoscience instructors, integrating inquiry-based approaches raises issues of (1) finding time to shift pedagogical styles, (2) choosing content to exclude to accommodate time-intensive inquiry approaches, and (3) developing the background and skill with using inquiry-based instructional strategies (Field, 2003). Despite these challenges, 414 Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 54, n. 3, May, 2006, p. 414-421 Integrating Inquiry-based Learning into Undergraduate Geology Xornam S. Apedoe Learning Research and Development Center, Room 818, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, xapedoe@pitt.edu Sally E. Walker Department of Geology, 320 Geology/Geography Building, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, swalker@gly.uga.edu Thomas C. Reeves Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology, 604 Aderhold Hall, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, treeves@uga.edu