Bis(l-4-hydroxy-2-oxidobenzaldehyde 4-ethylthiosemicarbazone)-j 4 O 2 ,N 1 ,S:- O 2 ;j 4 O 2 :O 2 ,N 1 ,S-bis[chloridozinc(II)] dimethyl sulfoxide trisolvate Kong Wai Tan, a Chew Hee Ng, b Mohd Jamil Maah a * and Seik Weng Ng a a Department of Chemistry, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and b Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Correspondence e-mail: mjamil@um.edu.my Received 14 March 2009; accepted 8 April 2009 Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 123 K; mean (C–C) = 0.005 A ˚ ; disorder in solvent or counterion; R factor = 0.042; wR factor = 0.134; data-to- parameter ratio = 19.2. The two Zn II atoms in the title compound, [Zn 2 (C 10 H 12 N 3 - O 2 S) 2 Cl 2 ]3C 2 H 6 OS, are each N,O,S-chelated by a mono- deprotonated Schiff base ligand. The Zn atoms are bridged through the phenolate O atom, leading to a central Zn 2 O 2 core. Each Zn atom has a Cl atom in the apical position of a distorted square-pyramidal environment. Hydroxy–DMSO (DMSO is dimethyl sulfoxide) O—HO and amide–DMSO N—HO hydrogen bonds link the components of the crystal structure. Two of the DMSO molecules are partially disordered, with each modelled over two sites of equal weight. Related literature For (4-hydroxy-2-oxidobenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazonato)- (phenanthroline)zinc DMSO monohydrate, see: Tan et al. (2009). Experimental Crystal data [Zn 2 (C 10 H 12 N 3 O 2 S) 2 Cl 2 ]3C 2 H 6 OS M r = 912.60 Triclinic, P 1 a = 9.4151 (1) A ˚ b = 12.4349 (2) A ˚ c = 17.2423 (2) A ˚ = 71.4438 (6) = 89.7703 (7) = 83.4964 (6) V = 1900.30 (4) A ˚ 3 Z =2 Mo Kradiation = 1.73 mm 1 T = 123 K 0.25 0.20 0.20 mm Data collection Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.672, T max = 0.724 17632 measured reflections 8627 independent reflections 7501 reflections with I >2(I) R int = 0.027 Refinement R[F 2 >2(F 2 )] = 0.042 wR(F 2 ) = 0.134 S = 1.00 8627 reflections 450 parameters 16 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Á max = 1.70 e A ˚ 3 Á min = 1.03 e A ˚ 3 Table 1 Hydrogen-bond geometry (A ˚ , ). D—HA D—H HA DA D—HA O2—H2OO5 0.84 1.85 2.623 (3) 153 O4—H4OO6 0.84 1.81 2.645 (4) 171 N2—H2NCl2 i 0.88 2.43 3.251 (2) 156 N3—H3NCl2 i 0.88 2.51 3.319 (3) 153 N5—H5NO7 0.88 1.90 2.706 (4) 152 N6—H6NO7 0.88 2.05 2.834 (4) 148 Symmetry code: (i) x þ 1; y; z þ 1. Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2009). We thank the University of Malaya (grant No. PS197/2008 A) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant No. ESc 02-02-11-SF0033) for supporting this study. KWT thanks the Ministry of Higher Education for an SLAI scholarship. Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: TK2395). References Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189–191. Bruker (2008). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Go ¨ttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Tan, K. W., Ng, C. H., Maah, M. J. & Ng,S. W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m61– m62. Westrip, S. P. (2009). publCIF. In preparation. metal-organic compounds Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, m549 doi:10.1107/S1600536809013385 Tan et al. m549 Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online ISSN 1600-5368