1 1 So If You Are Not “Nastasha,” Who are you? - Revealing the Other Trafficked Women and Their Uses? John Davies and Benjamin Davies Davies, J., & Davies, B. (2010). So If You Are Not “Nastasha,” Who are you? In T. Zheng (Ed.), Sex Trafficking, Human Rights, and Social Justice. Taylor & Francis. INTRODUCTION The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, was adopted by the United Nations in Palermo, Italy some ten years ago. In 2009 IOM organized a retrospective of the negotiations of the protocol in Palermo and invited many of the leading commentators and campaigners who participated in lobbying or framing those negotiations to reflect on what had been achieved through a decade of anti-trafficking work. The conference presenters were asked to specifically comment on anti-trafficking initiatives and what might be the future of trafficking. In my own contribution to the conference I suggested that such were the inherent failings of trafficking as a conceptualisation of vulnerability in migration that in 30 years time the trafficking protocol would probably be forgotten and modern trafficking would be remembered as just another inadequate moral panic about the mobility of poor women (Davies 2009). I imagined that the trafficking protocol would then be of no more particular relevance than other mostly forgotten UN conventions such as the 1949 Convention on the Prostitution of Others (Davies 2009). However, I also stated the instigators and the greatest beneficiaries of what are the present trafficking harms in Europe should be clearly named and shamed. Hopefully, this would allow the history of trafficking when it is written to identify who were the real and substantive beneficiaries of trafficking (Davies 2009).