[MJTM 11 (2009–2010) R11–R14] BOOK REVIEW Stanley N. Gundry, Kenneth Berding, and Jonathan Lunde, eds. Three Views on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Counterpoints: Bible and Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008. 256 pp. Pbk. US$16.99. Three Views on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament provides a helpful window into some of the debates surrounding the use of Old Testament texts by New Testament authors within an evangelical context. The book has three main components: an introduction, a body composed of the three different views of the use of the OT in the NT with responses to each view by the fellow respondents, and a conclusion. The introduction by Lunde is intended to guide readers through elements of the history of the debates in the use of the OT in the NT, to put forward the commonly held assumptions of the three evangelical scholars, and to note briefly the major issues presented by the three views represented in the body of the book. He describes these debates in terms of a central issue and five orbiting issues. The central issue is the relationship between the OT and the NT authors’ intended meanings. The orbiting issues are the roles of sensus plenior, typology, context, and Jewish exegetical methods in the NT authors’ use of the OT material, and whether we are able to replicate such exegetical and hermeneutical approaches to the OT today. The three views are represented by Walter Kaiser, Darrell Bock, and Peter Enns. Kaiser describes his view as “Single Meaning, Unified Referents.” He argues that the authors of the OT had a single intent in their writing, which is also the intent of the NT authors’ use of the OT text. Kaiser believes that what the OT author had in mind included the future use of his text and thus the referents in the NT are completely consistent and unified