1 The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More Definitely Better 1 RENDY WIRAWAN The great-scale of agreement signed in 1968 to limit and dis- ploriferate the nuclear spreading meets its zenith and ineffectiveness. The rate of nuclear ownership across the world had escalated to the astonish number, exclude the five nuclear states confirmed in the treaty. The nuclear weapons ownership seminates to the certain states, signatories or not. To some extend this phenomenon is unstoppable and unmanageable. However, this condition creates the uncertainty of peace and security due its imbalance of the world order that seemingly owned by the states which possessed nuclear weapons. Further, it must be true that the non-proliferation treaty was no longer effective and inherent to the states signed it previously. The fact we could not deny is that the number of nuclear weapons is escalating and the five nuclear states confirmed in the treaty are also raise their capacity to produce and breed the nuclear weapons. Some of the states are also suffering for the insecurity due the absence of nuclear weapons within them. ‘Haves and have-nots’ increases the insecurity and threat amongst the states and creates further conflict, then peace would not be attained. Therefore, the spreading of nuclear weapons must be existing to utter the certainty of world peace and security through its mutual assurance element. *) This paper is dedicated to Kenneth Neal Waltz (June 8, 1924 – May 12, 2013) who helped shape International Relations as a discipline with his tremendous works over decades. This paper completed on the date when Waltz should celebrate his 89 th birthday. The title of the paper is made similarly with the Waltz previous work on Adelphi Paper (The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More Might be Better?) in an attempt to complement his thesis. DzNuclear weapons are the only peacekeeping weapons that the world has ever known. It would be strange for me to advocate for their abolition, as they have made wars all but impossibledz - Kenneth N. Waltz *