Public Relations Review 39 (2013) 1–12 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Public Relations Review Networks of social capital: Extending a public relations model of civil society in Peru Erich J. Sommerfeldt * Department of Communication, University of Maryland-College Park, 2130 Skinner Building, College Park, MD 20742-7635, United States a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 20 May 2012 Received in revised form 27 July 2012 Accepted 7 August 2012 Keywords: Public relations Civil society Social capital Peru Networks a b s t r a c t Scholars have argued that public relations can and indeed must be used to improve society. This article builds on the work of Taylor and Doerfel (2005), who advocated for the contin- ued study of civil society through the lens of public relations theory. This study contributes to a normative public relations model of civil society by examining how interorganizational relationships, which may initially be established for purposes of resource exchange, benefit civil society through the creation and maintenance of social capital. The study examined a segment of Peruvian civil society dedicated to media development, as media is a key partner in building civil society (Taylor, 2009). The results of the study help to explain how interorganizational relationships contribute to the creation of social capital in a civil society network, and how certain network positions are integral to maintaining the social capital of a community of actors. Implications for the role of public relations in building and maintaining networks of interorganizational communities are discussed. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The existence of a robust civil society is thought by many scholars to be an essential precondition of a successful democracy (e.g., Doerfel & Taylor, 2004; Gibson, 2001; Hadenius & Uggla, 1996; Taylor, 2000; Taylor & Doerfel, 2005, 2011). However, it is the quality of relationships among civil society actors and organizations that may truly demonstrate whether civil society is capable of supporting democracy and what Heath (2006) termed a “fully functioning society.” Given the important role of interorganizational relationships in civil society, Taylor and Doerfel (2005) argued that public relations has much to contribute to civil society research. They suggested, “public relations, as a relationship-building function . . . must be at the center of the civil society process” (p. 122). A civil society requires quality relationships to be effective and to benefit a community of actors from the social capital generated through such relationships (Sommerfeldt & Taylor, 2011; Taylor, 2009; Taylor & Doerfel, 2011). Assessing the relationships that exist among civil society actors, then, is essential to understanding the efficacy of civil society movements and to how public relations may support civil society. More work is needed to integrate public relations into civil society theory and practice. The purpose of this study is to further Taylor and Doerfel’s (2005) public relations model of civil society in two ways. First, the study examined how relationships facilitate social capital by questioning whether organization–public relationships among civil society actors lead to increased levels of social capital. Second, the study further interrogates the concept of structural holes in social networks (Burt, 1992a) by examining the extent to which important civil society organizations are bridging structural holes and maintaining quality relationships so that social capital in a civil society network is maximized. * Tel.: +1 301 405 6528. E-mail address: esommerf@umd.edu 0363-8111/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.08.005