Neurobiology of Aging 24 (2003) 397–413
Gene expression analysis in a transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans
Alzheimer’s disease model
Christopher D. Link
a,∗
, Andrew Taft
a
, Vadim Kapulkin
a
, Kyle Duke
b
,
Stuart Kim
b
, Qing Fei
c
, Douglas E. Wood
c
, Barbara G. Sahagan
c
a
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Campus Box 447, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
b
Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
c
CNS Discovery, Pfizer Global R&D, Groton, CT 06340, USA
Received 19 June 2002; received in revised form 8 October 2002; accepted 20 November 2002
Abstract
We have engineered transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans animals to inducibly express the human beta amyloid peptide (A). Gene
expression changes resulting from A induction have been monitored by cDNA hybridization to glass slide microarrays containing probes
for almost all known or predicted C. elegans genes. Using statistical criteria, we have identified 67 up-regulated and 240 down-regulated
genes. Subsets of these regulated genes have been tested and confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. To investigate whether genes identified in
this model system also show gene expression changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain, we have also used quantitative RT-PCR to examine
in post-mortem AD brain tissue transcript levels of B-crystallin (CRYAB) and tumor necrosis factor-induced protein 1 (TNFAIP1), human
homologs of genes found to be robustly induced in the transgenic C. elegans model. Both CRYAB and TNFAIP1 show increased transcript
levels in AD brains, supporting the validity of this approach.
© 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Alzheimer; Transgenic; Caenorhabditis elegans; Microarray; Quantitative RT-PCR; Inducible expression; A42
1. Introduction
Many lines of evidence support the view that the beta
amyloid peptide (A) is centrally involved in Alzheimer’s
disease pathogenesis (reviewed in [30]). However, the mech-
anism(s) of A toxicity remain unresolved. Establishing the
cellular response to A exposure should provide clues to the
mechanism of A toxicity. This cellular response is likely to
be reflected in gene expression changes, and thus the pow-
erful technique of DNA microarray hybridization has been
applied to post-mortem AD brain tissue [10,13,22,26] or
post-mortem microglia exposed to synthetic A 1–42 [33].
Interpretation of these studies is complicated by numerous
factors, including the genetic and environmental heterogene-
ity of the samples, use of post-mortem tissue, and the likely
long time lag between the onset of pathology and when tis-
sue was recovered for the analysis. We have developed a
simplified model based on inducible transgenic expression
of human A 1–42 peptide in the nematode Caenorhabdi-
tis elegans that has allowed us to examine A-dependent
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-303-735-5112; fax: +1-303-492-8063.
E-mail address: linkc@colorado.edu (C.D. Link).
gene expression independent of the confounding factors de-
scribed above.
We have previously demonstrated that in transgenic C. el-
egans animals expression of a human A minigene driven
by a constitutive muscle-specific promoter leads to the accu-
mulation of intracellular A-immunoreactive deposits and
intracellular amyloid, leading to a progressive paralysis phe-
notype [19,21]. Intracellular A dimers have been detected
in primary human neurons and in neuronal cell lines [34],
and intraneuronal A42 has also been demonstrated in hu-
man brain [11]. Recent studies have also implicated intracel-
lular A 1–42 in apoptosis of transfected rat cortical neurons
[15]. Here we describe a new transgenic model that allows
temperature-dependent induction of A, which results in a
rapid and dramatic paralysis of induced transgenic animals.
This inducibility has allowed us to look at gene expression
changes occurring both before and after gross pathological
changes (paralysis). Given that we are using a simplified in-
vertebrate model, the goal of these studies was not to gen-
erate a detailed global description of the gene expression
response to intracellular A accumulation, but instead to
identify candidate specific A-responsive genes that could
subsequently be investigated in other AD models and human
0197-4580/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00224-5