Peter Attema, Јаn Delvigne, and Bernit-Jan Haagsma
1NTRODUCT10N
This сопtгibutiопintends toillustratetheimportanceof
lосаlenvironmentalreconstructionforthe interpretation
of aIchaeological data. The data deIive from field work
that was carried out since 1987 as part of the Pontine
Region Project (PRP). This ргоесt includes landscape
andarchaeologicalsuгvеуsofsampleагеаsinthePontine
Region, about 60 kmsouth of Rome in the province of
Lazio (Figs. 1 1 . 1 and 1 1.2). Fieldwork before 1991 has
Ьееп publishedinAttema (1993).
Fromthebeginning,thestrategyoftheprojectwasto
сотпе environmental and агсhаеоlоgiсаI field data -
the topic of this contribution- with cartographicaI, his
toricaI, and ethnographical information. 1t was felt that
these sources togethel" would furnish а sound basis for
diachronicreconstructionsofthewaysјпwhichthevагiеd
Iandscapes of the Pontine Region were used in the past.
Thearchaeologicalinterest ofthe projectisthedevelop
ment of Latial society from the Late Bronze Age to the
Roman 1mperiaI period (. 1000 BC-AD 400).
PhysiographicaIIy,threemајогIandscapetypesсапЬе
deIineated. Thefirstisthedissectedlandscapebelonging
tothevo1canicsystemoftheСоlliAlbani, whichborders
the Pontine plain to the northwest. 1tis the landscape in
whichthe Latinsocietyofthe1ron Age developed. The
secondisthePontineplain,аgraben filledwithlagoonal
deposits (notoriously maIshy before the wholesale Iand
reclamationsof thelate 1920s), separated fromtheТуг
IhenianseaЬуаsystemofbeachridges.1nthehistoryof
sеdепtагуsettlementofthePontineRegion,thislandscape
wasопlуputtomarginaIuse. Thirdly,thereisthezoneof
theLepiniandAusonimountais.Economic andpoIitical
сопtгоI of its foothills and slopes Ьесате increasingly
importantfromеагlуRomantimesonwrds.
TheаЬоуеcharacterizationis,however,аhighlysimpli
fied image of а far тоге dynamic and divегsе [ea1ity.
NaturaIIy, the human activities were not limited to апу
опеof theabove-mentionedI andscapesduringthevarious
episodesofthe settlement historyofthePontineRegion
human landscapes аге not necessarily defined Ьу the
natural environment, nor аге they equivalent to 'our'
physiographic landscapes ог 'оиг' regions. Оп the со п
trary, theагсhаеоlоgуandhistoryofsettlement andland
useinthePontineregionгеуеаlеуегnewcombinationsof
landscape elementstoЬеinuse, оуег time resultinginа
palimpsestof 'supeIimposed' landscapes.Thesewerenot
опlу defined Ьу functionalist categories (subsistence,
technology, resources), but also Ьу ideological ones
(tгаditiоп, re1igion, powel" relationships), with environ
mentalchangeaffectingboth.
Since the theme of the уоlите is landscape archae
ologyandenvironmentalIeconstruction,wepresentthree
casestudiesthatillustгаtеtheiпtегрlауbetweenenviron
mental and archaeological data in reconstructing and
iпtегргеtiпgsettlementand landusepatternsinthefirst
millenniumвс. Casestudies1and2агеconcernedwith
erosionandsedimentationepisodesIoughlypin-pointed
intimeusingarchaeologicaldating(ceramics)andradio
сагЬопdating. Case study3 considersа poIIendiagram
in relation to а specific Roman Republican settlement
pattern.
CASE1: MUDFLOWSED1MENTS NEAR ТНЕ S1TE
OFCARACUPAALV1SC10,O
Outline о[ the case-study
Some aspects of sedimentation inthe suгvеу агеа were
investigatedопаlocationintheplainbeneaththeRoman
соlопуof Norba, пеагtheLatinsettlementofСагасира
Valvisciolo. п eposure in а foundation pit revealed
mudflowdepositsопtopofcoIIuvialdeposits. Thiscase
of environmental change bears directly ироп the land
scae potentiaI of this particular part of the plain. As
such,ithelpstoreconstructthelосаlenvironmentofthe
protohistoric settlement of Сагасира Valvisciolo. The
exposurealsocontainedfeaturesofdirect archaeological
interest.
Case studies from the Pontine Region in Central Italy
on Settlement and Enviromental Change in the
First Millenium BC
11.