Vol. , No. Ethnomusicology Fall
© 2012 by the Society for Ethnomusicology
houghts on an Interdiscipline:
Music heory, Analysis, and Social heory
in Ethnomusicology
Gabriel Solis / University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana
I
n an analytical and hortatory article in the Yearbook for Traditional Music
about theory in ethnomusicology, and on the nature of ethnomusicological
theory, Timothy Rice manifests a telling contradiction regarding music theory
as a part of the discipline (2010b).
1
he article is quite useful in providing sys-
tematic ways of thinking about social theory and its role in ethnomusicology as
well as the autochthonous modes of theorizing—about society, about culture,
about the world—that we do in our discipline; but where it comes to theorizing
about musical sound, Rice is unclear in a way that is at least unhelpful to his
argument in the article, and potentially deleterious to our practice as a discipline
as we move into the future.
2
On the one hand, he draws on a host of examples
of the most signiicant work in the ield in which theorizing about and closely
analyzing musical sound plays a central role, but on the other, when he discusses
music theory (by which I believe he means the production of generalizations
about musical structure in the abstract) he does so in a way that diminishes its
currency and importance to ethnomusicology. In this essay, I take the position
that we need a metatheoretical perspective on the discipline that recognizes the
ongoing signiicance of close analysis of musical sound in a range of studies and
the production of music theory by ethnomusicologists over the past thirty years.
his work, I argue, is not separate from the “interpretive turn,” as Rice calls the
growing importance of social theory in ethnomusicology since the 1980s, but,
rather, interconnected with it. As Martin Stokes says in his portion of the entry
on “Ethnomusicology” in the New Grove Dictionary, the opposition between
“texts and contexts” can be seen as a false one (Pegg et al. n.d.).
As will become clear throughout this article, my use of the term “music
theory” is intentionally somewhat vague here. I take it, in the irst instance (seem-