Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective on the Study of Interactions F. Morganti, A. Carassa, G. Riva (Eds.) Amsterdam, IOS Press, 2008, pp. 65-79 5 Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Investigation of Primate Intersubjectivity Timothy P. RACINE, David A. LEAVENS, Noah SUSSWEIN, Tyler J. WEREHA Abstract. Historically, the ability to point and conversely the absence of pointing in other great ape species has been interpreted as evidence of great discontinuity across the primate lines in the ability to share meaning with an interlocutor. However, this conclusion ignored a variety of observations of nonhuman primates pointing in captivity over the past century and was put to rest by careful experimental work conducted in especially the past decade. Now the debate concerns the human ability to declaratively point and the absence of declarative pointing in other great apes and the same discontinuous conclusions are being drawn. In this chapter, we argue that this is a continuation of the same debate that presupposes certain problematic ideas about the nature of meaning and mind. We attempt to show that the mental state of, for example, a pointer is not what makes an act declarative (or imperative) and we examine this mentalistic picture of the mind that guides the work of theorists who claim to be advancing very different explanations of early social cognition. We then turn to a more general methodological critique of existing research in order to show that the lack of valid empirical evidence can speak to these issues. Contents 5.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 65 5.2 Conceptual clarification, theory construction and empirical research ................ 67 5.3 Drawing undrawable conclusions ....................................................................... 71 5.4 Conclusions......................................................................................................... 76 5.5 References........................................................................................................... 77 5.1 Introduction It is generally agreed that we share some capacity for basic forms of intersubjective engagement with other primate species [1, 2]. For example, chimpanzees and humans are both adept at following another’s gaze and signalling with communicative gestures. But there is debate concerning how to accurately characterize the cognitive differences across species, particularly concerning the extent to which other apes are able to reach human levels of shared meaning. The general consensus, as a pair of recent target articles in the prestigious journal