SHERRATT, A. 1983. The secondary exploitation of animals in the Old World. World Archaeology 15: 90-114. VON DEN DRIESCH A. & H. OBERMAIER. 2007. The hunt for wild dromedaries during the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC on the United Arab Emirate coast. Camel bone finds from the excavations at Al Sufouh 2, Dubai, UAE, in G. Grupe & J. Peters (ed.) Skeletal series and their socioeconomic context (Documenta Archaeobiologiae 5): 133-67. Rahden: M. Leidorf. WENDRICH, W. & H. BARNARD. 2008. The archaeology of mobility: definitions and research approaches, in H. Barnard & W. Wendrich (ed.) The archaeology of mobility: Old World and New World nomadism: 1-21. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Univer- sity of California. WHEELER, J.C., L. CHIKHI & M.W. BRUFORD. 2006. Genetic analysis of the origins of domestic South American camelids, in M.A. Zeder, D.G. Bradley, E. Emshwiller & B.D. Smith (ed.) Documenting domestication: new genetic and archaeological paradigms: 329-41. Berkeley: University of California Press. WRIGHT, J., W. HONEYCHURCH & C. AMARTUVSHIN. 2009. The Xiongnu settlements of Egiin Gol, Mongolia. Antiquity 83: 372-87. ZEDER, M.A. 2011. The origins of agriculture in the Near East. Current Anthropology 52: S221-35. Animal Paleopathology Robin Bendrey Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, Reading, UK Introduction A relationship is a two-way entity. The different partners within it influence each other to a greater or lesser extent. So it is true for the long history of human-animal relationships (Fig. 1): each has affected the individual lives, and also the histor- ical trajectories of whole populations, of the other. It is these stories that animal paleopathol- ogy can elucidate. The domestication of animals, for example, changed the course of development of human society and economy and in doing so affected human health and disease. Bringing animals together in larger, denser herds, in close association with human communities, would have changed the ecology of infectious diseases for both parties. Definition Animal paleopathology is the study of health, disease, and injury in past animal populations from the analysis of preserved hard and soft tissues. It is concerned primarily with the bones and teeth routinely recovered from archaeologi- cal sites, but can also include studies of soft tissues (mummified remains, bog bodies), and articulates with a range of related research areas, such as paleoparasitology, paleodiets, molecular biology, veterinary medicine, and human paleopathology. Through studies of skeletal abnormalities and alterations related to disease and injury, a range of interpretations can be formed and forwarded relating to past econo- mies and societies, environments and living conditions, animal husbandry techniques, and disease ecology. Key Issues/Current Debates/Future Directions/Examples The current state of the discipline of animal paleopathology and several of the key issues under debate (in particular those relating to meth- odology) are perhaps best viewed and understood through a brief retrospective on the discipline. Methodological Problems and Biases In considerations of the state of the discipline, parallels are often drawn with its close relative, human paleopathology (O’Connor 2000: 98; Thomas & Mainland 2005). Human paleopathol- ogy is a discipline reaching back into the nineteenth century. It is a mature subject, with well-established and consistently applied proto- cols and methodologies. Animals were included in paleopathological reviews in the earlier twen- tieth century, but it was only from the 1960s, with the work of such specialists as R.A. Harcourt and D.R. Brothwell, that the foundations of animal paleopathology really began to take off. The pub- lication in 1980 of a general textbook on the subject by Baker and Brothwell (1980) is widely recognized as a seminal moment for animal paleopathology. This volume, a collaborative A 258 Animal Paleopathology