Sensors and Actuators B 199 (2014) 330–338
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
jo u r nal homep age: www.elsevier.com/locate/snb
Development of electrochemical biosensor with ceria–PANI
core–shell nano-interface for the detection of histamine
Manju Bhargavi Gumpu
a,b
, Noel Nesakumar
a,c
, Swaminathan Sethuraman
a,b
,
Uma Maheswari Krishnan
a,b
, John Bosco Balaguru Rayappan
a,c,∗
a
Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India
b
School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India
c
School of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 January 2014
Received in revised form 19 March 2014
Accepted 3 April 2014
Available online 15 April 2014
Keywords:
Histamine
CeO2–PANI
Diamine oxidase
Cyclic volatammetry
Amperometry
Tiger prawn
a b s t r a c t
A mediator-free electrochemical biosensor with CeO
2
–PANI nano-interface for sensing histamine using
diamine oxidase (DAO) has been developed. CeO
2
–PANI core–shell nanoparticles were prepared by
hydrothermal method. The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) revealed the aggre-
gated spherical morphology of CeO
2
. The core–shell formation of CeO
2
–PANI was confirmed with field
emission transmission microscopy (FE-TEM). The polycrystallinity of CeO
2
and CeO
2
–PANI was confirmed
using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Immobilization of DAO with CeO
2
–PANI was confirmed with Fourier trans-
form infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Electrochemical studies were carried out through cyclic voltammetry
and amperometry using modified GCE/CeO
2
–PANI/DAO as a working electrode, Ag/AgCl saturated with
0.1 M KCl as a reference electrode and platinum (Pt) wire as a counter electrode. The linear range was
observed from 0.45 to 1.05 mM with a sensitivity of 724.94 A cm
-2
mM
-1
. Michaelis–Menten constant
was calculated as 0.798 mM. It exhibited limit of detection of 48.7 M, limit of quantification of 132.4 M
with a response time of <1 s and good shelf life of 86% till 18 days. Also the developed biosensor was
applied on tiger prawn to estimate the histamine content.
© 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
1. Introduction
Histamine is a heterocyclic low molecular weight organic com-
pound formed by enzymatic removal of carboxyl group from
histidine, found in various foods such as meat, fish, alcoholic bever-
ages, vinegar, fermented foods etc [1,2]. Improper handling, storage
conditions, availability of free amino acids and optimum tempera-
tures are the main reasons for increase in histamine concentration
thereby leading to the toxification of fish related food items [3,4].
Consumption of such fish leads to “Histaminosis” or “Scombroid
fish poisoning” causing both physiological and toxicological effects
based on dosage [5].
According to World review of fisheries and aquaculture in 2011,
production of fish is estimated to be 154 million tonnes all over
the world which signifies that the rate of consumption is being
increased. As a result, safety evaluation of fish and its products
∗
Corresponding author at: Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials
(CeNTAB) & School of Electrical & Electronics Engineering (SEEE) SASTRA University,
Thanjavur 613 401, India. Tel.: +91 4362 264 101x255; fax: +91 4362 264120.
E-mail address: rjbosco@ece.sastra.edu (J.B.B. Rayappan).
became a key determinant to avoid adverse effects. As a part of food
safety evaluation, levels of histamine in fish are limited to 0.45 mM
by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [3,5].
To detect histamine levels in fish and its related products,
many enzymes such as methyl amine dehydrogenase, monoamine
oxidase (MAO), diamine oxidase (DAO) etc., have been used.
Among these, DAO is of particular interest as it shows high speci-
ficity towards histamine and also it can oxidatively deaminate
histamine [6]. To estimate histamine levels for fish freshness deter-
mination various analytical methods such as high performance
liquid chromatography [7,8], Spectrofluorimetry [9], thin layer
chromatography [10], ELISA, capillary electrophoresis, impedance
spectroscopy [11], microdialysis [12] etc., have been used. But all
these methods require sample preparation and time consuming
[13].
In a step of advancements in biosensors, Telsing et al. developed
a voltammetric pea seedling amine oxidase modified biosensor
which was able to detect cadaverine, putrescine with a linear range
of 30–88 g mL
-1
and 24–67 g mL
-1
respectively, but it failed
to detect histamine [14]. Lomillo et al. developed a disposable
biosensor which showed poor precision in terms of repeata-
bility [15]. Also, various electrochemical based biosensors were
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.04.009
0925-4005/© 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.