Identification and Characterization of a Novel RNA Binding Protein That
Associates with the 5′-Untranslated Region of the Chloroplast psbA mRNA
²
Dwight Barnes,
‡,§
Amybeth Cohen,*
,‡,|
Richard K. Bruick,
§,⊥
Katherine Kantardjieff,
#
Sean Fowler,
|
Ekem Efuet,
§,4
and Stephen P. Mayfield
§
Department of Biological Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for
Molecular Structure, California State UniVersity Fullerton, Fullerton, California 92834-6850, and
Department of Cell Biology and Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute,
10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037
ReceiVed October 27, 2003; ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed March 17, 2004
ABSTRACT: Binding of proteins to chloroplast-encoded mRNAs has been shown to be an essential part of
chloroplast gene expression. Four nuclear-encoded proteins (38, 47, 55, and 60 kDa) have been identified
that bind to the 5′-untranslated region of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii psbA mRNA with high affinity
and specificity. We have cloned a cDNA that represents the 38 kDa protein (RB38) and show that it
encodes a novel RNA binding protein that is primarily localized within the chloroplast stroma. RB38
contains four 70 amino acid repeats with a high percentage of basic amino acids, as well as an amino-
terminal extension predicted to act as a chloroplast import sequence. We demonstrate that the 38 kDa
precursor protein is imported into isolated chloroplasts and interacts with high specificity to uridine-rich
regions within the 5′-untranslated region of the psbA mRNA. While database searches have identified
hypothetical proteins from several other eukaryotic species with high sequence similarity to the deduced
amino acid sequence of RB38, no proteins with homology to RB38 have been biochemically characterized.
Bioinformatic analysis of the RB38 sequence, together with structure analysis using circular dichroism
and protein modeling, suggests that the 70 amino acid repeats within RB38 are similar in fold to previously
identified RNA binding motifs, despite limited sequence homology.
Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression involves a
number of posttranscriptional processes, including those
affecting mRNA stability and translation. The interaction
between RNA binding proteins and the corresponding RNA
elements found within particular mRNAs has been shown
to be an essential part of translational regulation. Conserved
themes emerge among a variety of organisms when evaluat-
ing mRNA binding proteins and the RNA elements they
recognize. The expanding database of RNA structures and
protein complexes suggests that unique protein-RNA in-
teractions are based on a relatively small set of functional
groups (1), and these interactions can have profound effects
on the expression of specific genes.
The 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs)
1
of both
prokaryotic and eukaryotic mRNAs play important roles in
translation. Often, these RNA elements are bound by specific
proteins as a means to regulate the translation of the adjacent
coding region. For example, poly(A) binding protein (PABP)
has been shown to play an important role in the initiation of
eukaryotic protein synthesis through an interaction with
eIF4G (yeast and plants) and eIF4B (plants) at the 5′ end of
the mRNA and direct interaction with the poly(A) tail on
the 3′ end of the mRNA (2-4). Prokaryotic systems also
utilize mRNA binding proteins for translational regulation.
However, these proteins typically inhibit translation after
binding to the 5′-UTR (5). Thus, RNA binding protein
interaction with specific RNA elements within UTRs is a
universal mechanism to enhance or inhibit translation.
The majority of mRNA binding proteins described to date
contain sheets that act to stabilize the interaction of charged
and aromatic side chains of the proteins with the RNA (1).
Most of these proteins contain a combination of sheets
and R helices that form the well-characterized RNA recogni-
tion motif (RRM) that binds to target RNA. PABP contains
a total of four RRMs that are positioned within conserved
amino acid sequences. Deo et al. (6) have shown by X-ray
²
This study was supported by funds from the Department of Energy
(ER15313) and the National Institutes of Health (GM54659) to S.P.M.
and by NIH Grant GM58808-01 to A.C. E.E. was supported by a
Skaggs postdoctoral fellowship.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: acohen@
fullerton.edu. Fax: (714) 278-3426. Phone: (714) 278-2178.
‡
D.B. and A.C. contributed equally to this work.
§
The Scripps Research Institute.
|
Department of Biological Science, California State University
Fullerton.
⊥
Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9152.
#
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and W. M. Keck
Foundation Center for Molecular Structure, California State University
Fullerton.
4
Present address: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, TX 77030.
1
Abbreviations: UTR, untranslated region; PABP, poly(A) binding
protein; RRM, RNA recognition motif; KH, K homology; RBD, RNA
binding domain; RBS, ribosome binding site; PDI, protein disulfide
isomerase; wt, wild type; IVT, in vitro translation; PAGE, polyacryl-
amide gel electrophoresis; PDB, Protein Data Bank.
8541 Biochemistry 2004, 43, 8541-8550
10.1021/bi035909j CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/12/2004