Engineering Notes ENGINEERING NOTES are short manuscripts describing new developments or important results of a preliminary nature. These Notes should not exceed 2500 words (where a gure or table counts as 200 words). Following informal review by the Editors, they may be published within a few months of the date of receipt. Style requirements are the same as for regular contributions (see inside back cover). Lateral-Directional Aircraft Dynamics Under Static Moment Nonlinearity Tiauw Hiong Go * Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Republic of Singapore DOI: 10.2514/1.39025 I. Introduction T HIS Note specically focuses on the aircraft lateral- directional dynamics in the presence of nonlinearity in lateral moments with respect to sideslip (static lateral moments). Such nonlinearity is often encountered during ight in the regimes in which the aerodynamic properties are nonlinear: for example, during high-angle-of-attack ight. In the previous works by the author [13], which focus on the multiple-degree-of-freedom wing-rock dynamics at high angles of attack, the results imply that by itself, the nonlinearity in the static lateral moments [such as that considered here (cubic polynomial with respect to sideslip)] does not lead to wing rock. Those analyses, however, consider only the situation in which the nonlinearity is relatively weak. In [4], cubic nonlinearity of static lateral moments with respect to sideslip is shown to cause wing rock in a multimode system in certain conditions. Because of these seemingly discrepant ndings, the topic is revisited here. This Note presents detailed analysis of the lateral-directional motion when the cubic type of static lateral moment nonlinearity is present in the system. The equations of motion as derived in [3] are used as the basis for the analysis. To gain physical insight into the problem, an analytical approach using the multiple-time-scales (MTS) method is used (see, for example, [5,6]). Both weak and strong nonlinearity cases are considered. II. Equations of Motion Figure 1 shows an example of nonlinear variations in rolling and yawing moment coefcients C l and C n with respect to the sideslip angle . The variations shown in the gure are typical for ghter aircraft at high angles of attack, although the strength of the variations may vary with congurations and ight conditions. Such nonlinearity can be represented by adding cubic terms in the expression for the lateral moments. All other nonlinearities are neglected in the current analysis, and thus the lateral moments can be expressed as follows: L=I xx L L 1 3 L p p L r r L _ _ N=I zz N N 1 3 N p p N r r N _ _ (1) where p is roll rate; r is yaw rate; is sideslip angle; _ is sideslip rate; I xx and I zz are the moments of inertia of the aircraft about its body x and z axes, respectively; L and N are the total rolling and yawing moments, respectively; L i and N i , where i , p, r, and _ are the usual linear stability derivatives; and L 1 and N 1 are the coefcients of the cubic sideslip terms, which represent the nonlinearity. In this formulation, the coupling between the longitudinal and the lateral- directional modes is neglected and the lateral-directional modes are analyzed separately. In [3], the nonlinear equations describing the attitude dynamics of a rigid aircraft with a conventional conguration with three rotational degrees of freedom have been derived. In the derivation, the trajectory of the center of mass of the aircraft is assumed to be straight and horizontal and is not affected by its attitude motion. The lateral- directional part of the equations are used as the basis of the analysis here and will not be rederived. With the preceding simplifying assumption on the nonlinearity, the equations of motion can be written as follows: ! 2 1 ~ 1 _ ~ 2 ~ 2 _ ~  3 ~ 1 ~ 3 ~ 1 _ ~ 2 _ ~  3 (2) where is the roll angle and ! 2 1 1=1 n 1 n 3 L n 1 N s N n 3 L c ~ 1 1=1 n 1 n 3 n 3 L r N r L r n 1 N r t L _ n 1 N _ s n 3 L _ N _ c ~ 2 g=Vc=1 n 1 n 3 N r n 3 L r L r n 1 N r t ~ 2 g=Vc 1=1 n 1 n 3 L p L r t n 1 N p N r ts N p N r t n 3 L p L r tc ~ 1=1 n 1 n 3 L 1 n 1 N 1 s n 3 L 1 N 1 c ~ 1 1=1 n 1 n 3 L n 1 N ~ 3 g=VL r n 1 N r =1 n 1 n 3 ~ 1 1=1 n 1 n 3 L p n 1 N p L r n 1 N r t ~ 2 1=1 n 1 n 3 L _ n 1 N _ L r n 1 N r =c ~ 1=1 n 1 n 3 L 1 n 1 N 1 (3) where g is the gravitational acceleration; V is the nominal airspeed; n 1 and n 3 are dened as I xz =I xx and I xz =I zz , respectively; and c, s, and t denote cos 0 , sin 0 , and tan 0 , respectively, where 0 is the nominal angle of attack of the ight. Note that the coefcients of the nonlinear lateral moment terms L 1 and N 1 appear only in ~ and ~ . III. Weak Nonlinearity Case As in [3], Eq. (2) is parameterized by imposing several assumptions. First, only the case in which the damping terms are Received 10 June 2008; revision received 20 August 2008; accepted for publication 25 August 2008. Copyright © 2008 by Tiauw Hiong Go. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 0731-5090/09 $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC. * Assistant Professor, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 50 Nanyang Avenue. Senior Member AIAA. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE,CONTROL, AND DYNAMICS Vol. 32, No. 1, JanuaryFebruary 2009 305