C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP/2098967/WORKINGFOLDER/MPN/9780521491907C11.3D 209 [209–228] 6.8.2010 7:54PM chapter 11 Blindness and reorientation: education and the acquisition of knowledge in the Republic C. D. C. Reeve Education is not, according to Socrates, “what some people boastfully profess it to be,” when they say they can “pretty much put knowledge (epistēmē) into souls that lack it, like putting sight into blind eyes” (518b8– c2). On the contrary, it “takes for granted that sight is there, though not turned in the right way or looking where it should look, and contrives to redirect it appropriately” (518d5–7). Properly conceived, education is the craft concerned with “this very turning around ... with how this instru- ment [with which each of us learns] can be most easily and effectively turned around, not of putting sight into it” (518d3–5), where the instrument in question is reason (logos) or the rational element (to logistikon)(580d8). Together with appetite (439d6–7), spirit (439e2–3, 581a9–b4), and perhaps a few other elements (443d7–8), reason constitutes the embodied human soul. Consequently, education cannot accomplish its task of reorienting reason without reorienting the whole soul, any more than an eye can be turned around except by turning the whole body (518c6–8). Primarily targeted on the reason, Platonic education is thus forced to extend its purview to appetite and spirit. In the Republic, this part of education is discussed first, in Books 2 and 3. But, since it does not involve the acquisition of knowledge (522a3–6), we will keep it offstage until the final act, so as to focus on Platonic education’s primary target and on the perplexing contrast Socrates draws between reorienting it and curing its blindness. When first introduced in Book 4, reason’s functions seem primarily practical. It is “really wise and exercises foresight on behalf of the whole soul,” and so is its proper or appropriate ruler (441e3–5), “guards the whole soul and the body against external enemies ... by deliberating” (442b5–7), and has “within it the knowledge of what is advantageous both for each part and for the whole, the community composed of all three” (442c5–7). By the time we reach Book 9, however, it seems to have become more contemplative or theoretical: reason is “always straining to know where 209 replace comma with dash: )— where