2014 Äê 9 35 5 Foreign Language Education Sept. 2014 Vol. 35 No. 5 ¼ÏñÆÀ·Ö : ÁõÓýºì 1 £¬ 1 £¬ 2 ( 1. 710061; 2. 030032) : £¬ £¬ £¬ ? ? £¬ £¬ £¬ : ; ; ; ; : H059 : A : 1000-5544( 2014) 05-0103-06 Abstract: This comparative study intends to explore whether discrepancies arise when the same group of students are assessed by the same raters with the same assessment criteria but different assessment methodson-the-spot and video assessment. The results show that the change of assessment method does have an impact on the marks. Raters are obviously stricter with video method where accuracy is mostly influenced among the three assessment items. This study may provide teachers with substance to consider which of the two assessment methods is more suitable for interpreter education. Key words: communicative testing theory; CI quality assessment; case study; on-the-spotassessment; video assessment 1. £¬ ( Martín & Abril Martí 2002: 81-94) £¬ £¬ £¬ ; £¬ £¬ ( Moser-Mercer 1996: 43-56) £¬ ( 1998; 2005 ) ( 2003; 2005; 2005; 2009) ( 2003; 2005) ( 2010; 2011) £¬ ( 2010: 157-158) £¬ £¬ : 1) £¬ £¬ £¬ £¬ ( 2011: 82-85); 2) £¬ £¬ £¬ ( 2003: 67-71); 3) ( 2005: 54- 58) £¬ / £¬ ; 4) £¬ £¬ £¬ ( 2008: 48-51 ) ; 5) £¬ £¬ £¬ 45 £¬ ? £¬ £¬ £¬ £¬ £¬ £¬ £¬ ( Angelelli 2004; Gile 2009; Hatim and Mason 1997; Pchhacker 2004 ) £¬ ( Kolb 1984 ) ( Vygotsky · 3 0 1 ·