DIGEST EDO-FL-03-08 • DECEMBER 2003
Action Research
RICHARD DONATO, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
CENTER FOR APPLIED LINGUISTICS • ERIC CLEARINGHOUSE ON LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS • 4646 40TH ST NW • WASHINGTON DC 20016-1859 • 202-362-0700
Actionresearchcaninformteachersabouttheirpracticeandem-
powerthemtotakeleadershiprolesintheirlocalteachingcontexts.
Mills(2003)providesthefollowingdeinitionofactionresearch:
Action research is any systematic inquiry conducted by
teacherresearcherstogatherinformationaboutthewaysthat
their particular school operates, how they teach, and how
welltheirstudentslearn.Theinformationisgatheredwith
the goals of gaining insight, developing relective practice,
effecting positive changes in the school environment and
oneducationalpracticesingeneral,andimprovingstudent
outcomes.(p.4)
Actionresearchisconductedbyteachersandforteachers.Itissmall
scale,contextualized,localized,andaimedatdiscovering,developing,
ormonitoringchangestopractice(Wallace,2000).Thedeiningfeatures
ofactionresearchalsorelectthequalitiesofleadersincollaborative
culturesofchange.Thesequalitiesincludeadeepunderstandingofthe
organization,visionandinsight,aquestfornewknowledge,adesire
forimprovedperformance,self-relectiveactivity,andawillingnessto
effectchange(Fullan,2000a,2000b).ThisDigestdiscussesaframework
forconductingactionresearchanddescribesanactionresearchstudy
carriedoutinanelementaryschoolSpanishprogram.
AFrameworkforActionResearch
Areviewofactionresearchframeworksrevealsseveralcommonfea-
tures.Anactionresearchprojectseekstocreateknowledge,proposeand
implementchange,andimprovepracticeandperformance(Stringer,
1996). Kemmis and McTaggert (1988) suggest that the fundamental
componentsofactionresearchincludethefollowing:(1)developing
aplanforimprovement,(2)implementingtheplan,(3)observingand
documentingtheeffectsoftheplan,and(4)relectingontheeffects
oftheplanforfurtherplanningandinformedaction.Newknowledge
gainedresultsinchangesinpractice(seealso,Fullan,2000a).Action
researchisoftenconductedtodiscoveraplanforinnovationorinter-
ventionandiscollaborative.BasedonKemmisandMcTaggert's(1998)
originalformulationofactionresearchandsubsequentmodiications,
Mills(2003)developedthefollowingframeworkforactionresearch:
•Describetheproblemandareaoffocus.
•Deinethefactorsinvolvedinyourareaoffocus(e.g.,the
curriculum,schoolsetting,studentoutcomes,instructional
strategies).
•Developresearchquestions.
• Describe the intervention or innovation to be imple-
mented.
•Developatimelineforimplementation.
•Describethemembershipoftheactionresearchgroup.
•Developalistofresourcestoimplementtheplan.
•Describethedatatobecollected.
•Developadatacollectionandanalysisplan.
•Selectappropriatetoolsofinquiry.
•Carryouttheplan(implementation,datacollection,data
analysis).
•Reporttheresults.
Thisdeductiveapproachimplementsaplannedintervention,moni-
torsitsimplementation,andevaluatestheresults.Amoreinductive
approach,formulatedbyBurns(1999),istocarryoutactionresearch
toexplorewhatchangesneedtobemadeorwhatactionsneedtobe
takeninaspeciic instructionalsetting.Burnssuggeststhefollowing
interrelatedactivities:
•Exploreanissueinteachingorlearning.
•Identifyareasofconcern.
• Observe how those areas play out in the setting of the
study.
•Discusshowtheissuemightbeaddressed.
•Collectdatatodeterminetheactiontobetaken(e.g.,student
questionnaires,observationreports,journalentries).
• Plan strategic actions based on the data to address the
issue.
KemmisandMcTaggert'sapproachfocusesonimplementinganaction
plan,whereasBurns’focusesonplanningforaction.
Commonly used data collection tools in action research projects
includeexistingarchivalsourcesinschools(e.g.,attendancereports,
standardizedtestscores,lessonplans,curriculumdocuments,),ques-
tionnaires, interviews, observation notes and protocols, videotapes,
photographs,journalsanddiaries,andnarratives(e.g.,storiestoldby
teachers,seeHartman,1998).
AnActionResearchProjectinPittsburgh:
ElementarySchoolSpanish
Thefollowingprojectillustrateshowteacherscanassumeleadership
rolestosupporttheirprograms,contributetotheknowledgebaseonthe
teachingandlearningofforeignlanguagesintheirschoolandschool
district,andpromotewell-informedchangesinpractice.
In 1996, a school district in suburban Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
decided to implement a foreign language in the elementary school
(FLES)program.Afterconsiderablediscussionofissuessuchassched-
uling,teacheravailability,andthenecessityofdevelopinglong-term
articulation from one grade to the next, the decision was made to
formaprogramsteeringcommitteeandproposetotheschoolboard
theimplementationofaSpanishFLESprogramthatwouldbeginin
September 1996 for all district kindergartners. The proposal recom-
mendedextendingtheprogramonegradeleveleachyear.Thatis,all
kindergartnersand irstgraderswouldparticipateintheprograminthe
1997-1998schoolyear,allkindergartnersandirstandsecondgraders
inthe1998-1999schoolyear,andsoon.TheBoardofSchoolDirectors
formallyapprovedtheplanandauthorizeda5-yearpilotproject.
Teachers as researchers. After 5 years of implementation, the
program steering committee had to prepare a presentation for the
school board that would demonstrate that the program was work-
ing, that the children were progressing, and that the approval of 5
more years of funding was warranted. Responding to this challenge