VOL. 9, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2014 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2014 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
1
IMPLEMENTION WASTES IN CONSTRUCTION
Mir Heydar Hashemi
1
, Nima Haj Mohammad Hassani Mamaghani
2
and Mojtaba Daei
1
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
2
Sama Technical and Vocational Training College, Islamic Azad University, Mamagan Branch, Tabriz, Iran
E-Mail: mh_hashemi@azaruniv.edu
ABSTRACT
The history of investigation on waste mainly revolves around the recycling of the waste, reusing the waste
materials, and the effect of waste on environment. No considerable studies have dealt with the identification of the causes
of waste. In the present study, the development of waste has been categorized in three groups of 1. Waste due to designing,
2. Waste due to implementation, and 3. Waste due to utilization. This study focuses on the waste due to implementation. It
provides a redefinition of construction waste. Overpopulation and the decrease of resources require a correct and wise use
of them. In all countries, a huge amount of the national capital is devoted to construction that signifies the importance of
investigations on waste to minimize it in the construction projects. The present study aims to introduce the causes of waste,
and to present a checklist to control and minimize it.
Keywords: waste, implementation standards, resource losses.
1. INTRODUCTION
The The present study investigates the various
reasons and factors of causing waste in construction and
building projects. Waste management can be taken into
account in two different levels: first, through managing
those factors that cause waste, and second, through
managing the wasted materials by reusing or recycling
them, and studying the effect of these materials on the
environment. The factors of causing waste are divided into
three categories: 1. Waste due to designing, 2. Waste due
to implementation, and 3. Waste due to utilization. This
study particularly deals with the wastes due to
implementation that stand among the first level wastes.
The wastes due to design and utilization have been
undertaken in another study. Identifying the causes of
waste can lead us to codify policies to prevent them.
Nowadays, the optimized use of the resources, and the
selection of the best option is the most important activity
of the construction managers. The main concern of the
building sites is to gain the optimized use of the resources
and the capital, and to demolish their wastage. All the
examples of waste are related to Iran; consequently, some
may exclusively concern the case of Iran, and on the other
hand, there might be cases in other countries that might
not be observed in the constructions taking place in this
country. The overall aim of the study is to identify and
enlist the causes of waste that can eventually result in their
localization for Iran.
The Significance of the Study
In regards to scientific perspectives: The presented
categorization of waste is novel and differs from the
categorizations in the literature of the waste study; this
adds to the significance of this study. The literature
indicates that in the studies, the waste of building material
has been regarded as “unwanted materials”, and waste has
been an “unfixed” subject matter (Wikipedia, 2013). In
this study, a different definition of waste is presented, and
the objective is to prevent waste from happening.
In regards to the implementation managers
and organizational needs
10% to 15% of the input materials and resources in sites
are wasted that directly affect the costs of the projects;
moreover, the reduction or even the demolition of waste is
a totally management concern that turns this study into an
important one for the managers and the organizational
needs. The objectives of the study: The aim of this study is
to identify, minimize, and possibly eliminate wastes from
the construction cycle. In practice, IPMA invites every
organization to create its specific ICB, called NCB7.
Today, approximately, thirty European countries, and
countries such as Egypt, India, and China are deploying
NCB Standard. Since the costs of every construction
project consist of 10% waste that can vary for every
country due to different implementation methods, waste
management is suggested to be considered in NCB
Standard. Spatial domain of the study: the study deals with
the projects of residential and office sites of Iran.
The time span of the study
By the passage of time, new implementation techniques
and machinery are introduced, and the construction
materials change in type that can affect the amount of
waste, the temporal domain of the study matters. The
samples and observations of the study are related to 2000-
10 decade.
The hypotheses of the study
Four hypotheses are raised for the study; 1. The causes and
factors of waste can be identified and managed; 2. The
reduction of waste is possible by training implementation
equips; 3. Building owners, advisors, contractors, and
building operators treat the problem of waste in a targeted,
specialized, and flow-charted way; 4. The type of
contracts (competitive bid, or agreement contracts) affect
the amount of waste. The Definition of Waste: Although
various definitions are given for waste, there has been no