J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 164 (2009) 66–75
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jnnfm
Modeling the thixotropic behavior of structured fluids
Paulo R. de Souza Mendes
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pontifícia Universidade Católica-RJ, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22453-900, Brazil
article info
Article history:
Received 1 June 2009
Received in revised form 6 August 2009
Accepted 10 August 2009
Keywords:
Viscoplastic fluid
Thixotropy
Structure parameter
abstract
A novel approach for modeling the mechanical behavior of thixotropic viscoplastic fluids is presented.
Non-monotonic flow curves, stress overshoot during microstructure breakdown flows at constant shear
rate, and viscosity bifurcation are some of the common aspects of structured fluids that are predicted by
the new model. It involves two evolution equations, one for the stress and the other for the structure
parameter. Simple ideas are employed to describe the microstructure, and, as a result, a model with a clear
physical basis is obtained. In addition to the flow curve, which by construction is exactly predicted, it is
shown that the model is able to predict correctly the behavior observed in the usual rheometric transient
flows, among which abrupt changes in shear rate (microstructure buildup or breakdown experiments)
and abrupt changes in shear stress (viscosity bifurcation experiments). The model is frame-indifferent
and applicable to complex flows.
© 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Structured fluids are found in a wide range of human activities.
Most suspensions, emulsions, and foams are structured fluids, and
some examples are: personal care products, cosmetics, different
foods, nanocomposites, paints, inks, cements, adhesives, greases,
natural muds, drilling muds, crude oils, gels, and mining, coal and
metal slurries.
Structured fluids exhibit non-Newtonian mechanical behavior.
At small stress levels, their microstructure often confers them an
elastic behavior. In this case, beyond a certain stress threshold, usu-
ally called yield stress, a major microstructure collapse occurs which
causes dramatic drops in viscosity and elasticity.
While under constant stress conditions for some long enough
period of time, the microstructure of a structured fluid usually
acquires a stable configuration, which is the result of the equilib-
rium between the microstructure buildup and breakdown rates. If
the microstructure changes do not occur instantaneously after a
stress change, the structured fluid is said to be time-dependent.
A time-dependent fluid is said to be thixotropic if its viscos-
ity decreases/increases with time as it undergoes a shear rate
increase/decrease, and if in addition these viscosity changes are
reversible. On the other hand, a time-dependent fluid is said to be
antithixotropic if its viscosity increases/decreases with time as it
undergoes a shear rate increase/decrease, and if in addition these
viscosity changes are reversible.
E-mail address: pmendes@puc-rio.br.
Most structured fluids that exhibit a yield stress are time-
dependent, especially in the small stress range. Some extent of
irreversibility in the microstructure changes is also often observed,
but modeling and characterizing the mechanical behavior of irre-
versible structured fluids are rather difficult tasks (e.g. [20]).
Actually, as far as their mechanical behavior is concerned, even
thixotropic fluids are far from being thoroughly understood [15].
Barnes [4] published a detailed review of thixotropy, where he
described the phenomenon, discussed numerous examples, sum-
marized its history, and gave an overview of the state of the art.
In this review, Barnes [4] pointed out that most of the then avail-
able theories only described the viscous thixotropic phenomenon,
and that only a few attempted to describe viscoelastic effects. He
grouped the viscous theories into three different categories: first
those that employ the so-called structure parameter, usually ,
a scalar quantity that typically varies in the interval [0, 1] and
represents an indirect measure of the level of structuring (these
are usually called structural kinetics models); second those that
use some direct information of the microstructure, usually called
microstructural models; and third those just based on viscosity-time
data.
As an example of viscoelastic model, Barnes [4] cited the one
set forth by Acierno et al. [1–3], although these workers focused on
low-density polyethylene rather than on thixotropic fluids. They
proposed a multimode Maxwell-type differential equation set for
stress whose relaxation times and shear moduli depend on a struc-
ture parameter.
Mujumdar et al. [17] also gave a thorough discussion of
the thixotropy literature, including a quite complete comparison
between the various structural kinetics models then found in the
literature. These models consist essentially of an evolution equation
0377-0257/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.08.005