Language and Literature 2015, Vol. 24(2) 129–147 © The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0963947015576168 lal.sagepub.com Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield Peter Stockwell University of Nottingham, UK Michaela Mahlberg University of Nottingham, UK Abstract We suggest an innovative approach to literary discourse by using corpus linguistic methods to address research questions from cognitive poetics. In this article, we focus on the way that readers engage in mind-modelling in the process of characterisation. The article sets out our cognitive poetic model of characterisation that emphasises the continuity between literary characterisation and real- life human relationships. The model also aims to deal with the modelling of the author’s mind in line with the modelling of the minds of fictional characters. Crucially, our approach to mind-modelling is text-driven. Therefore we are able to employ corpus linguistic techniques systematically to identify textual patterns that function as cues triggering character information. In this article, we explore our understanding of mind-modelling through the characterisation of Mr. Dick from David Copperfield by Charles Dickens. Using the CLiC tool (Corpus Linguistics in Cheshire) developed for the exploration of 19th-century fiction, we investigate the textual traces in non-quotations around this character, in order to draw out the techniques of characterisation other than speech presentation. We show that Mr. Dick is a thematically and authorially significant character in the novel, and we move towards a rigorous account of the reader’s modelling of authorial intention. Keywords Character, CLiC, cognitive poetics, corpus stylistics, David Copperfield, Dickens, mind-modelling, Mr. Dick, suspensions, Theory of Mind 1 Introduction One of the most significant shifts in narratology in recent years has been the recognition that literary narrative fiction can be defined not by event but by character. It used to be Corresponding author: Professor Peter Stockwell, School of English, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Email: peter.stockwell@nottingham.ac.uk 576168LAL 0 0 10.1177/0963947015576168Language and LiteratureStockwell and Mahlberg research-article 2015 Article