Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships Juliet Richters A,J , Dennis Altman B , Paul B. Badcock C,D , Anthony M. A. Smith C,I , Richard O. de Visser E , Andrew E. Grulich F , Chris Rissel G and Judy M. Simpson F A School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. B Office of the Vice-Chancellor, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. C Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. D Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia. E School of Psychology, Pevensey 1, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK. F The Kirby Institute, Wallace Wurth Building, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. G Sydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. H Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. I Deceased. J Corresponding author. Email: j.richters@unsw.edu.au Abstract. Background: Behavioural and other aspects of sexuality are not always consistent. This study describes the prevalence and overlap of same-sex and other-sex attraction and experience and of different sexual identities in Australia. Methods: Computer-assisted telephone interviews were completed by a representative sample of 20 094 men and women aged 16–69 years recruited by landline and mobile phone random-digit dialling with a response rate (participation rate among eligible people) of 66.2%. Respondents were asked about their sexual identity (‘Do you think of yourself as’ heterosexual/straight, homosexual/gay, bisexual, etc.) and the sex of people with whom they had ever had sexual contact and to whom they had felt sexually attracted. Results: Men and women had different patterns of sexual identity. Although the majority of people identified as heterosexual (97% men, 96% women), women were more likely than men to identify as bisexual. Women were less likely than men to report exclusively other-sex or same-sex attraction and experience; 9% of men and 19% of women had some history of same-sex attraction and/or experience. Sexual attraction and experience did not necessarily correspond. Homosexual/gay identity was more common among men with tertiary education and living in cities and less common among men with blue-collar jobs. Many gay men (53%) and lesbians (76%) had some experience with an other-sex partner. More women identified as lesbian or bisexual than in 2001–02. Similarly, more women reported same-sex experience and same-sex attraction. Conclusion: In Australia, men are more likely than women to report exclusive same-sex attraction and experience, although women are more likely than men to report any non-heterosexual identity, experience and attraction. Whether this is a feature of the plasticity of female sexuality or due to lesser stigma than for men is unknown. Additional keywords: asexuality, bisexuality, heterosexuality, homosexuality, same-sex attraction, sexual behaviour, sexual orientation. Received 18 June 2014, accepted 23 August 2014, published online7November2014 Introduction Categorising a person’s sexuality is not a simple matter of asking them a single question about their ‘orientation’. There are at least three aspects to consider: (1) how people describe or think of themselves; (2) whether they say they are or have been attracted to males and/or females; and (3) whom they have had sex with (in the widest definition of what counts as ‘sex’). 1,2 Even these three aspects of sexuality omit how one is seen by others (a matter not readily accessible to survey research) and indeed wider questions of types of, or motives for, sexual CSIRO PUBLISHING Sexual Health, 2014, 11, 451–460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH14117 Journal compilation Ó CSIRO 2014 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/sh