Modeling DownConversion and DownShifting for Photovoltaic Applications Ahmed M. Gabr 1 , Jeffery F. Wheeldon 1 , Richard M. Beal 1 , Alex Walker 1 , Justin Sacks 2 , Rachel M. Savidge 2 , Trevor J. Hall 1 , Rafael N. Kleiman 2 and Karin Hinzer 1 1 Center for Research in Photonics, University of Ottawa, 800 King Edward, K1N 6N5, Ottawa, ON, Canada 2 Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, L8S 4L7, Hamilton, ON, Canada               !          " #        !$ !              !$     " !     !                 #%&"’(                 ! " !      )!   &*  +             ,-*   !$  ! " #          .//*         &0"&*  &1"1*    &1",*    !  &//*"          " I. INTRODUCTION The ideal maximum theoretical efficiency of a single junction solar cell under standard, terrestrial solar irradiation is 33% [1]. This is limited by subbandgap losses, thermalization of carriers with energies greater than the semiconductor bandgap, and radiative recombination losses. For commercial grade silicon solar cells, efficiencies are normally limited by nonradiative recombination losses, which yield overall efficiencies closer to 1518%. Surface recombination is an example of a nonradiative recombination process that occurs across the interface between different material layers due to the presence of a sufficiently high density of trap states. This can be an important loss mechanism for poorly passivated solar cells, which leads to a significant rolloff in the spectral response at high photon energies. Downconversion (DC) and luminescent down shifting (LDS) are two methods being pursued in the photovoltaic research community in order to mitigate thermalization and/or surface recombination losses in single junction solar cells [2–5]. It is envisaged that the application of DC and LDS will be compatible with existing commercial solar cell fabrication processes, thereby providing a cost effective method to boost the efficiency of flatplate photovoltaic devices. DC, otherwise referred to as quantumcutting, is an optical process whereby one highenergy photon is absorbed and converted into two lowerenergy photons, as shown in Fig. 1(a). By tailoring the absorption and emission properties of a DC layer, it should be possible to convert highenergy photons into lowerenergy photons. These lowerenergy photons are targeted to be more efficiently converted to charge carriers within the solar cell due to a reduction in thermalization and surface recombination losses at the lower energy. Down conversion was first theoretically suggested by Dexter in the 1950’s [6] and was shown experimentally only in the 1970’s using lanthanide ion praseodymium, Pr 3+ in an yttrium fluoride, YF 3 host [7]. Trupke et al. have shown, using detailed balance calculations, that a theoretical maximum efficiency of 38.6% is achievable for a downconverter with bandgap of 2.2 eV located on the front surface of a solar cell with bandgap of 1.1 eV [2]. Trupke et al. assumed only radiative recombination takes place in the device and a non concentrated 6000 K black body spectrum. LDS is also an optical process similar to DC with the exception that one highenergy photon (blue) is absorbed and converted into a single lowerenergy photon (red), as shown in Fig. 1(b). In this case, the only effect is to ‘shift’ highenergy photons into a more efficient region of the solar cell’s spectral response which is typically at a lower energy. Losses due to thermalization are not mitigated, but losses due to surface recombination can be mitigated. The concept of coupling LDS to solar cells that perform poorly in the UV region was first introduced by Hovel et al [3]. Recent studies show the potential of using LDS layers for solar cell performance enhancement [5], [8–11]. 978-1-4673-0066-7/12/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE 000048 978-1-4673-0066-7/12/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE 000048