Peptides 39 (2013) 36–46 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Peptides j our na l ho me p age : www.elsevier.com/locate/peptides Review The effects of nociceptin peptide (N/OFQ)–receptor (NOP) system activation in the airways Shailendra R. Singh a,b , Nikol Sullo a,c , Bruno D’Agostino c , Christopher E. Brightling b , David G. Lambert a,∗ a Department of Cardiovascular Sciences (Pharmacology and Therapeutics Group), Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK b Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK c Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology L. Donatelli, Second University of Naples, Napoli, Italy a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 25 September 2012 Received in revised form 17 October 2012 Accepted 22 October 2012 Available online 1 November 2012 Keywords: Nociceptin/orphanin FQ Asthma Airway hyper-responsiveness Airway inflammation Cough a b s t r a c t The heptadecapeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the endogenous ligand for the N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptor. It is cleaved from a larger precursor identified as prepronociceptin (ppN/OFQ). NOP is a member of the seven transmembrane-spanning G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. ppN/OFQ and NOP receptors are widely distributed in different human tissues. Asthma is a complex heterogeneous disease characterized by variable airflow obstruction, bronchial hyper-responsiveness and chronic air- way inflammation. Limited therapeutic effectiveness of currently available asthma therapies warrants identification of new drug compounds. Evidence from animal studies suggests that N/OFQ modulates airway contraction and inflammation. Interestingly up regulation of the N/OFQ–NOP system reduces airway hyper-responsiveness. In contrast, inflammatory cells central to the inflammatory response in asthma may be both sources of N/OFQ and respond to NOP activation. Hence paradoxical dysregulation of the N/OFQ–NOP system may potentially play an important role in regulating airway inflammation and airway tone. To date there is no data on N/OFQ–NOP expression in the human airways. Therefore, the potential role of N/OFQ–NOP system in asthma is unknown. This review focuses on its physiological effects within airways and potential value as a novel asthma therapy. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Contents 1. N/OFQ and NOP receptor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2. Asthma and airway inflammation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3. Physiological effects of N/OFQ–NOP system activation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4. N/OFQ and its effects on airway contractility and inflammation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 4.1. Animal studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2. Human studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 5. Effects of N/OFQ on the cough reflex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 5.1. Animal studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 5.2. Human studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 6. Concluding remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Authors contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Conflicts of interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Abbreviations: N/OFQ, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ); NOP, nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor; GPCR, G-protein couples receptor; DOP, delta opioid peptide receptor; MOP, mu opioid peptide receptor; KOP, kappa opioid peptide receptor; ppN/OFQ, prepronociceptin; ASM, airway smooth muscle; NOX, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation endproducts; PAMPS, pathogen-associated molecular pattern receptors; DAMPS, damage-associated molecular pattern receptors; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; EFS, electrical field stimulation; HCl, hydrochloric acid; OVA, ovalbumin; GABA A , (-aminobutyric acid A). ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 0116 258 5694/5291; fax: +44 0116 247 0141. E-mail addresses: ss616@le.ac.uk (S.R. Singh), ns331@le.ac.uk (N. Sullo), bruno.dagostino@unina2.it (B. D’Agostino), ceb17@le.ac.uk (C.E. Brightling), dgl3@le.ac.uk (D.G. Lambert). 0196-9781/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2012.10.008