Quantification of Ovarian Power Doppler Signal With
Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography to Predict
Response During In Vitro Fertilization
Ilkka Y. Ja ¨rvela ¨, MD, Povilas Sladkevicius, MD, Simon Kelly, MD, Kamal Ojha, MD,
Stuart Campbell, MD, and Geeta Nargund, MD
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether power Doppler predicts
ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation during in
vitro fertilization (IVF).
METHODS: Forty-five women were divided into low-reserve
(n 12) and normal-reserve (n 33) ovarian groups,
according to antral follicle count. Transvaginal three-di-
mensional power Doppler ultrasonographic examinations
were performed after pituitary downregulation and after
gonadotrophin stimulation. The antral follicle count, ovar-
ian volume, vascularization index, flow index, vasculariza-
tion flow index, and mean gray value were measured and
related to the number of oocytes retrieved and the preg-
nancy rate.
RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved correlated with
the antral follicle count (R .458, P .004) and ovarian
volume (R .388, P < .016) but not with vascularization
index, flow index, vascularization flow index, or mean gray
value after pituitary suppression. There was an increase in
vascularization index (P < .017), flow index (P < .001), and
vascularization flow index (P < .007) during gonadotro-
phin stimulation in the normal-ovary group but not in the
low-ovarian-reserve group.
CONCLUSION: According to our results, quantification of
power Doppler signal in the ovaries after pituitary suppres-
sion does not provide any additional information to predict
the subsequent response to gonadotrophin stimulation dur-
ing IVF. The increase in ovarian power Doppler signal
during gonadotrophin stimulation is related to the antral
follicle count observed after pituitary suppression.
(Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:816 –22. © 2003 by The Amer-
ican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.)
The ability of the ovary to respond to exogenous gona-
dotrophin stimulation and to produce several mature
oocytes simultaneously is essential for successful in vitro
fertilization (IVF). Ovarian responsiveness is highly vari-
able and therefore difficult to predict. Transvaginal ul-
trasonography has proved to be an easy and noninvasive
method to provide essential information on the ovarian
responsiveness before the initiation of gonadotrophin
stimulation.
1–5
Ovarian volume as determined by trans-
vaginal ultrasonography seems to correlate with the
ovarian reserve. Lass et al
6
observed that small ovaries
are associated with poor response to human menopausal
gonadotropin and a very high cancellation rate during
IVF. Similarly, the number of antral follicles seems to
correlate with the response to gonadotrophin stimula-
tion.
2–5
A very low number of antral follicles seems to be
associated with poor response and a high cancellation
rate,
2–5
whereas a high number of antral follicles seems
to predict not only good response but also sometimes an
increased risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
4
It is possible to classify the ovaries according to ultra-
sonographic features as inactive or active, even before
the initiation of gonadotrophin stimulation.
2
It seems that follicular blood flow plays a major role
during the growth and development of the follicle con-
taining the oocyte.
7–11
The follicle acquires a vascular
sheet of its own at the antral stage.
12
Combining the
color Doppler facility in ultrasonography has enabled
the detection and measurement of the follicular blood
flow. According to two-dimensional color Doppler stud-
ies, peak systolic velocity of individual follicles on the
day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection
and egg collection correlates with oocyte recovery,
7,8
development potential of the oocyte,
10
quality of the
embryo,
7,9
and even with the pregnancy rate during IVF
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oulu University Hospital,
Oulu, Finland; Diana, Princess of Wales Center for Reproductive Medicine,
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. George’s Hospital Medical
School, London, United Kingdom; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Kvinnokliniken, Universitetsjukhuset MAS, Malmo ¨, Sweden; and Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada.
This research was supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship of the European
Community Program “Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources” (to
IYJ) under contract number QLRI-CT-1999-51230.
816 VOL. 102, NO. 4, OCTOBER 2003 0029-7844/03/$30.00
© 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00693-8