Hindawi Publishing Corporation
International Journal of Endocrinology
Volume 2013, Article ID 327265, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/327265
Clinical Study
A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel
Study of Vitamin D3 Supplementation with Different Schemes
Based on Multiples of 25,000 IU Doses
Etienne Cavalier,
1
Werner Faché,
2
and Jean-Claude Souberbielle
3
1
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
2
Zuidstationstraat, Gent, Belgium
3
Laboratoire d’Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France
Correspondence should be addressed to Etienne Cavalier; etienne.cavalier@chu.ulg.ac.be
Received 26 October 2012; Revised 17 December 2012; Accepted 17 December 2012
Academic Editor: Vin Tangpricha
Copyright © 2013 Etienne Cavalier et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
Vitamin D (VTD) treatment is recommended in patients presenting different causes of diseases. To treat these patients, physicians
rely on the different available pharmaceutical forms present in their country. Unfortunately, even in a given country, there is no
consensus on the best way to treat the patients. In Belgium, VTD is mostly prescribed as ampoules containing 25,000 IU of VTD. In
this randomised controlled study, we evaluated whether four therapeutic schemes using multiples of 25,000 IU of VTD according
to basal vitamin D concentration were able to increase or maintain the 25(OH)D serum level above 30ng/mL. We randomized
175 subjects who received the drug (n = 140) or placebo (n = 35). Total duration of the study was 12 weeks. Doses ranged from
4167 to 1667 IU/day. Blood sampling was performed at baseline and each 4 visits. In the treated (placebo) subjects, mean 25(OH)D
serum concentration was 18.7 (19.1) ng/mL at baseline and 31.5 (20.7) ng/mL at w-12. At the end of the study, 57.1% of the subjects
treated with VTD presented 25(OH)D serum concentration ≥30 ng/mL, whereas 94.3% were ≥20 ng/mL. In conclusion, the doses
administered were safe and increased or maintained the 25(OH)D concentration ≥20 ng/mL. However, concentrations ≥30 ng/mL
were only achieved in 57.1% of the subjects.
1. Introduction
Vitamin D de�ciency has recently been identi�ed as a world-
wide problem [1]. Indeed, the dietary sources of vitamin
D are scarce, the only really signi�cant ones being marine
fatty �sh, although egg yolk and some mushrooms could be
additional sources [2]. us, in humans, the major source
of vitamin D comes from the exposure of the skin to
sunlight. While, in tropical zones, UVB radiation is sufficient
throughout the year, it is absent for a signi�cant part of the
year in more northern (or southern) latitudes. In Belgium
(around 51
∘
North), the UVB ray will be insufficient to
allow the skin synthesis of vitamin D during approximately
6 months of the year. Hence, while all experts agree that
the 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) level is the correct
indicator of vitamin D status, they do not agree on the
25(OH)D level that should be used to de�ne vitamin D
sufficiency. Indeed, the expert panels from the Endocrine
Society [3] or the Institute of Medicine (IOM) [4] have
recently released divergent recommendations on the use of
vitamin D. e recent report by the IOM indicates that a
25(OH)D level of 20 ng/mL is largely sufficient and the RDIs
set forth should be sufficient for 97.5% of the population
to achieve that level whereas the Endocrine Society group
considers that the optimal 25(OH)D level for musculoskeletal
health should be 30 ng/mL and more in individual patients.
It should be considered that the IOM cutoff is intended for
public health recommendations while the Endocrine Society
group targets its recommendations on patient care and
considers that vitamin D de�ciency (what should be avoided
in any patient) corresponds to 25(OH)D levels <20 ng/mL
and insufficiency (what may be deleterious for a signi�cant