Downloaded By: [Samson, Andrea C.] At: 12:24 27 May 2008 Cognitive humor processing: Different logical mechanisms in nonverbal cartoons * an fMRI study Andrea C. Samson University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Stefan Zysset Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany, and NordicNeuroLab, Bergen, Norway Oswald Huber University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Although recent fMRI studies on humor have begun to elucidate cognitive and affective neural correlates, they weren’t able to distinguish between different logical mechanisms or steps of humor processing, i.e., the detection of an incongruity and its resolution. This fMRI study aimed to focus in more detail on cognitive humor processing. In order to investigate pure incongruity resolution without preprocessing steps, nonverbal cartoons differing in their logical mechanisms were contrasted with nonhumorous pictures containing an irresolvable incongruity. The logical mechanisms were: (1) visual puns (visual resemblance, PUNs); (2) semantic cartoons (pure semantic relationships, SEMs); and (3) Theory of Mind cartoons (which require additionally mentalizing abilities, TOMs). Thirty cartoons from each condition were presented to 17 healthy subjects while acquiring fMR images. The results reveal a left-sided network involved in pure incongruity resolution: e.g., temporo-parietal junction, inferior frontal gyrus and ventromedian prefrontal cortex. These areas are also involved in processing of SEMs, whereas PUNs show more activation in the extrastriate cortex and TOMs show more activation in so- called mentalizing areas. Processing of pictures containing an irresolvable incongruity evokes activation in the rostral cingulate zone, which might reflect error processing. We conclude that cognitive processing of different logical mechanisms depends on separate neural networks. INTRODUCTION Humor is an essential human characteristic and can be evoked by verbal (jokes) or visual materi- als (cartoons or movies), as well as in social situations. Cartoons are one common humor medium, showing pictures containing incongru- ous elements that have to be resolved in order to understand the punch line. In understanding cartoons, a stage of incongruity detection can be distinguished from a stage of incongruity resolu- tion (e.g., Suls, 1972). First, the incongruity has to be detected in the cartoon, then it has to be resolved in order to understand the punch line of # 2007 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business Correspondence should be addressed to: Andrea Samson, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, rue Faucigny 2, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland. E-mail: andrea.samson@unifr.ch We would like to thank the Research Foundation of the University of Fribourg for financial support. The authors would like to thank Mandy Naumann, Annett Wiedemann and Domenica Wilfing for their support with acquiring the fMRI data, Markus Widmer for providing the Image_Rating program, Michael Munz and Susi Kolarik for the support during the pre-examinations. We also thank Christian F. Hempelmann, Willibald Ruch and Jan Derrfuss for their helpful comments and discussions on an earlier version of this paper. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 3 (2), 125140 www.psypress.com/socialneuroscience DOI:10.1080/17470910701745858