This paper attempts to discuss Remembering Babylon (1993) by the Australian writer David Malouf as postcolonial work. The main argument of this paper aims at discussing the novel in terms of cultural hybridity, which may occur due to the interaction between the colonizer and the colonized. The paper investigates the notions of Homi Bahabha (1909-1966). Bahabha concentrated in his studies of post- colonialism on culture and identity hybridization caused by the influence of colonization. Hybridity refers in its most basic sense to mixture. Colonization experience is a mixture between the colonizer and the colonized, who come from a totally different cultures and civilizations. Bahabha in his book The Location Of Culture (1994) sets out the conceptual imperative and the political consistency of a postcolonial intellectual project in a dazzling series of interdisciplinary essays. He explains why the culture of Western modernity must be relocated from the postcolonial perspective. Setting its argument in contexts as diverse as nineteenth-century colonial history, contemporary literary and psychoanalytic theory and the imperatives of minority cultures. The Location Of Culture exploits and engenders those moments of ambivalence that structure social authority. Bahabha shows how the legitimating narratives of cultural domination can be displaced to reveal a "third space". Here, the most creative forms of cultural identity are produced on the boundaries in-between forms of difference in the interactions and overlaps across the shapes of class, gender, race, nation, generation, and location (Bahabha3). Bahabha, a professor Sussex university has a great role in postcolonial studies, particularly in cultural studies. He sheds the light on many aspects in his book, but my argument is concerned with three related notions, which are; hybridity, mimicry, ambivalence and third space. It has a great significance to know what is the meaning of these concepts before discussing the novel.