IN VITRO AND IN VIVO BIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF LONG-CIRCULATING
BIODEGRADABLE DRUG CARRIERS LOADED WITH THE PURE
ANTIESTROGEN RU 58668
Thibault AMELLER, Ve ´ronique MARSAUD, Philippe LEGRAND, Ruxandra GREF and Jack-Michel RENOIR
*
UMR CNRS 8612, Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Mole ´culaire, Cha ˆtenay-Malabry, France
We have developed a parenteral delivery system for the
administration of the highly promising pure antiestrogen RU
58668 (RU). Two types of nanoparticles (NP) made of biode-
gradable copolymers and coated with polyethylene-glycol
(PEG) chains were prepared: nanospheres (NS) (diameter,
110 nm) and nanocapsules (NC) with an oily core (diame-
ter, 250 nm). The amount of RU incorporated into NS and
NC was 33 vs. 5 g RU/mg of polymer, respectively.
Coating with PEG chains prolonged the antiestrogenic po-
tency of RU, as shown by a prolonged antiuterotrophic activ-
ity of encapsulated RU into PEG-poly(D,L lactic acid) (PLA)
NS, as compared to that of conventional nonpegylated NS. In
mice bearing MCF-7 estrogen-dependent tumors, free RU
injected at 4.3 mg/kg/week by i.v. route slightly decreased the
estradiol-promoted (0.5 mg/kg/week) tumor growth while
RU-loaded PEG-PLA NS injected at the same dose strongly
reduced it. Analysis of cell cycle parameters in tumors
treated with RU indicated that RU-loaded PEG-PLA NS in-
jected at 4.3 mg/kg/week in MCF-7 tumors decreased cyclin
D
1
and cyclin E simultaneously, and increased p27. The anti-
tumoral activity of RU encapsulated within pegylated NC was
stronger than that of RU entrapped with pegylated NS
loaded at an equivalent dose. Indeed, the former decreased
the tumor size in nude mice transplanted with the estrogen
receptor-positive but estrogen-independent MCF-7/Ras
breast cancer cells at a concentration 2.5 times lower than
that of the latter (0.4 mg/kg/week compared to 1 mg/kg/
week). Empty PEG-PLA NS and NC were devoid of an-
tiuterotrophic and antitumoral activities. Altogether, these
results suggest that the incorporation of the pure antiestro-
gen RU into long-circulating NP could represent a novel
antiestrogen drug delivery system for the parenteral route.
© 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Key words: breast cancer; antiestrogen; drug delivery; nanoparticles
Hormone therapy consists of the abrogation of signals carried by
natural hormones in order to block their biologic effects. This type
of therapy has been used as a treatment for hormone-dependent
cancers for more than 30 years. Worldwide, close to 1 million
women per year are diagnosed with breast cancer.
1
Of all breast
cancer patients, about one-third respond to hormone therapy, and
this response is unfortunately only transient with a median dura-
tion of about 18 months.
2
Endocrine therapy of hormone-depen-
dent breast cancer consists of a variety of both medical and
surgical ablative treatment modalities aiming at suppressing the
mitogenic action of endogenous estradiol.
3
The classic mechanism
by which estradiol exerts its effects is through binding to its
intranuclear receptor (estradiol receptor (ER)) and the activation of
target genes that promote cell cycle progression and tumor growth
in breast cancer. A number of molecules displaying partial or total
antagonistic activity have been synthesized.
3
However, the recent
discovery of a second ER, ER,
4
has considerably complicated our
understanding of the mechanism of action of estradiol and also of
the pharmacology of these antiestrogenic molecules.
5
Tamoxifen
(Nolvadex), delivered orally at 40 mg/day, is the most frequently
used antiestrogen at the moment. Tamoxifen and its active metab-
olite 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen are mixed antagonists/agonists whose
activity is determined by the nature of the promoter to which ER
binds, the nature of the ER ( or ) predominantly present in the
tissue and the cellular content in terms of the coactivator/coinhibi-
tor ratio.
5
For example, tamoxifen acts as a strong antagonist in the
breast, but behaves as a full agonist in the uterus where it can
induce carcinomas.
3
Thus, tamoxifen appears as an archetypal
selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), with several unde-
sirable side effects (hot flashes, induction of uterine cancers), but
also some beneficial effects in the skeleton (inhibitory of bone
resorption) as well as in the cardiovascular and central nervous
systems (decrease of the incidence of coronary heart disease,
improvement of cognitive function and delay of the onset of
Alzheimer’s disease, respectively (see MacGregor and Jordan
3
and
references cited therein). Unfortunately, tamoxifen resistance al-
ways occurs, and in that case, a blockade of E
2
synthesis by
aromatase inhibitors is sometimes of benefit (see Simpson et al.
6
for a review). In other cases, there is no response to aromatase
inhibitors. Thus, despite encouraging improvements in breast can-
cer treatment, prognosis of metatastic disease is dramatic, stressing
the need of new drugs and new administration strategies. Among
the antiestrogenic compounds that have been synthesized, the
7-estradiol derivative ICI 182,780
7
and the 11-estradiol deriv-
ative RU 58668 (RU)
8
have been shown to inhibit tamoxifen
resistance.
9 –11
Both are considered as pure antiestrogens, com-
pounds that exert their activity even in the absence of E
2
. ICI
182,780 (Faslodex or Fulvestrant) has recently obtained the
Marketing Authorization Application from the FDA.
12
However,
in mice bearing human breast cancer tumors, RU act as an inhibitor
of tumor progression, while ICI 182,780
11,13
behaves as a cyto-
static drug. Therefore, RU appears as a promising antihormone for
breast cancer treatment, and for this reason, we decided to work
with RU rather than the ICI molecule.
Nevertheless, the administration of a pure antiestrogen will have
detrimental effects on skeleton and other tissues where estradiol
has great benefits, if it is widely distributed throughout the body.
RU also has poor oral bioavailability.
8
Taking into account that
Abbreviations: E
2
, estradiol; ER, estradiol receptor; ERE, estrogen re-
sponsive element; IC
50
, 50% inhibitory concentration; LUC, luciferase;
NC, nanocapsules; NP, nanoparticles; NS, nanospheres; PEG, polyethyl-
ene-glycol; PLA, poly(D,L lactic acid); RES, reticulo endothelial system;
RU, RU 58668 (11-[4 –[5-[(4, 4, 5, 5, 5, pentafluoropentyl)sulfonyl]pen-
tyloxy]phenyl]-estra-1, 3, 5 (10)-triene-3,17-diol); SERD, selective estro-
gen receptor downregulator; SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator.
Grant sponsor: Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer; Grant
numbers: 9863 and 5970; Grant sponsor: Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique; Grant sponsor: Paris XI University; Grant sponsor: Minist` ere
de la Recherche et de la Technologie; Grant sponsor: Ligue Nationale
contre le Cancer; Grant sponsor: Ernst Schering Foundation.
*Correspondence to: UMR CNRS 8612, Pharmacologie Cellulaire et
Mol´ eculaire, 5 rue Jean-Baptiste Cl´ ement, 92296 Chˆ atenay-Malabry,
France. Fax: + 33-(0)1-46-83-58-32.
E-mail: Michel.Renoir@cep.u-psud.fr
Received 28 November 2002; Revised 13 March 2003; Accepted 31
March 2003
DOI 10.1002/ijc.11248
Int. J. Cancer: 106, 446 – 454 (2003)
© 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Publication of the International Union Against Cancer