Crack Healing in Ti 2 Al 0.5 Sn 0.5 CAl 2 O 3 Composites Guo Ping Bei, , Birgit Joana Pedimonte, Marc Pezoldt, Johannes Ast, § Tobias Fey, Mathias Goeken, § and Peter Greil Department of Materials Science (Glass and Ceramics), University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, Martensstr. 5, Erlangen 91058, Germany § Department of Materials Science (General Material Properties), University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, Martensstr. 5, Erlangen 91058, Germany Oxidation induced crack healing of Al 2 O 3 composites loaded with a MAX phase based repair filler (Ti 2 Al 0.5 Sn 0.5 C) was examined. The fracture strength of 20 vol% repair filler loaded composites containing artificial indent cracks recovered fully to the level of the virgin material upon isothermal annealing in air atmosphere after 48 h at 700°C and 0.5 h at 900°C. SEM- EBSD analysis of crack microstructure indicates two different oxidation reaction regimes to govern the crack filling: near the surface SnO 2 , TiO 2 , and Al 2 O 3 were formed whereas deeply inside the cracks Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 and metallic Sn were detected. The presence of elemental Sn was attributed to par- tial oxidation of aluminum and titanium which lowered the local oxygen concentration below a threshold value required for Sn oxidation to SnO 2 . Thus, Ti 2 Al 0.5 Sn 0.5 C may represent an efficient repair filler system to trigger oxidation induced crack healing in ceramic composites at temperatures below 1000°C. I. Introduction S INTERED Al 2 O 3 is one of the most important engineering ceramics which is widely being used for numerous wear, chemical, electrical, medical, and other applications. Depend- ing on the residual porosity and purity it may offer high hardness and wear resistance, excellent chemical inertness, high strength, and moderate thermal conductivity as well as good nuclear stability. 1 However, its relatively low fracture toughness <6 MPam 1/2 may give rise for failure of a mechan- ically loaded component primarily in the presence of surface cracks. Improving the flaw tolerance envisages toughening of Al 2 O 3 by embedding particle or fibers to trigger process zone or crack bridging energy-transfer mechanisms. 2 Another approach is to induce crack healing to recover strength after damage induced crack formation or growth. 3 Research work on crack healing in Al 2 O 3 ceramic can be traced back to 1970s. 4 Gupta et al. reported on the crack heal- ing and strength recovery behavior of thermally shocked Al 2 O 3 upon annealing above 1400°C. 5 Crack closure was attributed to grain growth and sintering as the dominating mechanisms. Enhanced healing ability was observed when the monolithic Al 2 O 3 ceramics were loaded with repair fillers such as SiC particles or whiskers which trigger oxidation crack heal- ing at temperatures below 1400°C. 6,7 Different parameters affecting the healing ability such as annealing temperature and time, 6 crack dimensions, 7 content and characteristics of repair filler, 8,9 healing environment 10 as well as oxygen pressure 11 were investigated. A volume fraction of 15%20% of SiC repair filler was found to give rise for complete strength recov- ery of the Al 2 O 3 /SiC composite. 69 Surface cracks of 100 250 lm in length were filled with silica oxidation product after annealing in air at 1300°C for 1 h. Prolonged annealing peri- ods of 10 and 300 h were required when the temperature was reduced to 1200°C and 1000°C, 6 respectively . More recently, a group of MAX phases M n+1 AX n (n = 1 to 3) where M is a transition metal, A is an A group ele- ment, and X is either carbon or nitrogen 12 where shown to exhibit interesting crack healing abilities. 13 For example, in Ti 3 AlC 2 extended cracks with a length up to 7 mm and a width of 5 lm could be fully healed after heat treatment at 1100°C for 2 h in air. Superior healing capability observed on Ti 2 AlC and Cr 2 AlC ceramics was attributed to the forma- tion of adhesive Al 2 O 3 filling the space between the disrupted crack surfaces. 14,15 Furthermore, repeatable crack healing was demonstrated on Ti 2 AlC. 15 We have reported on the oxi- dation behavior of Ti 2 Al (1x) Sn x C MAX phases solid solu- tion. 16 Substitution of Al by Sn was demonstrated to reduce the onset temperature of oxidation from 900°C (Ti 2 AlC) down to 700°C (Ti 2 SnC). Loading Al 2 O 3 with Ti 2 SnC repair filler was able to achieve crack healing of the composite at temperatures below 1000°C. 17 The mechanism of crack space filling reaction, however, still remained an open question. Thus, the scope of this work is to investigate the crack filling and strength recovery of Al 2 O 3 composite loaded with Ti 2 Al 0.5 Sn 0.5 C solid solution repair filler. Analyses of the ele- mental and the phase distribution of the crack filling material were correlated with the recovery kinetics to identify opti- mized healing conditions. II. Experimental Procedure A high purity (> 99.99%) submicrometer alumina powder (AKP-53; Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) with a mean particle size d (0.5) 0.10.3 lm served as the matrix material for the preparation of the Al 2 O 3 MAX phase com- posites. Ti 2 Al 0.5 Sn 0.5 C solid solution repair filler with d (0.5) 19 lm was synthesized from reactant powder mix- tures consisting of Ti (4.5 lm, 99.4% purity), Al (<45 lm, 99.5% purity), Sn (2 lm, 99.4% purity) and TiC (2 lm, 99% purity) with a molar composition corresponding to Ti 0.5Sn0.5Al0.9TiC and annealed under vacuum at 1400°C for 1 h. Al 2 O 3 Ti 2 Al 0.5 Sn 0.5 C composites with repair filler fractions of 5, 10, and 20 vol% were sintered at 1350°C for 4 h in Ar atmosphere (Heraeus Holding GmbH, Hanau, Germany) applying a heating rate of 5 K/min. Samples dedicated for mechanical investigation were polished to 1 lm surface finish with diamond suspension and cut into bar specimens with dimensions of 2.5 mm 3 9 2.0 mm 3 9 27 mm 3 . Surface cracks were generated by means of Vickers’ indentation F. Wakai—contributing editor Manuscript No. 35832. Received October 27, 2014; revised January 8, 2015; approved January 8, 2015. Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: guoping.bei@ww. uni-erlangen.de 1604 J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 98 [5] 1604–1610 (2015) DOI: 10.1111/jace.13496 © 2015 The American Ceramic Society J ournal