ORIGINAL PAPER TDP-43 pathological changes in early onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, late onset Alzheimer’s disease and Down’s Syndrome: association with age, hippocampal sclerosis and clinical phenotype Yvonne S. Davidson Samantha Raby Penelope G. Foulds Andrew Robinson Jennifer C. Thompson Stephen Sikkink Imran Yusuf Hanan Amin Daniel DuPlessis Claire Troakes Safa Al-Sarraj Carolyn Sloan Margaret M. Esiri Vee P. Prasher David Allsop David Neary Stuart M. Pickering-Brown Julie S. Snowden David M. A. Mann Received: 8 August 2011 / Revised: 6 September 2011 / Accepted: 6 September 2011 Ó Springer-Verlag 2011 Abstract TDP-43 immunoreactive (TDP-43-ir) pathologi- cal changes were investigated in the temporal cortex and hippocampus of 11 patients with autosomal dominant familial forms of Alzheimer’s disease (FAD), 169 patients with spo- radic AD [85 with early onset disease (EOAD) (i.e before 65 years of age), and 84 with late onset after this age (LOAD)], 50 individuals with Down’s Syndrome (DS) and 5 patients with primary hippocampal sclerosis (HS). TDP-43-ir pathological changes were present, overall, in 34/180 of AD cases. They were present in 1/11 (9%) FAD, and 9/85 (10%) EOAD patients but were significantly more common (p = 0.003) in LOAD where 24/84 (29%) patients showed such changes. There were no demographic differences, other than onset age, between AD patients with or without TDP-43- ir pathological changes. Double immunolabelling indicated that these TDP-43-ir inclusions were frequently ubiquitinated, but were only rarely AT8 (tau) immunoreactive. Only 3 elderly DS individuals and 4/5 cases of primary HS showed similar changes. Overall, 21.7% of AD cases and 6% DS cases showed hippocampal sclerosis (HS). However, only 9% FAD cases and 16% EOAD cases showed HS, but 29% LOAD cases showed HS. The proportion of EOAD cases with both TDP-43 pathology and HS tended to be greater than those in LOAD, where nearly half of all the cases with TDP-43 pathology did not show HS. The presence of TDP-43-ir changes in AD and DS may therefore be a secondary Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0879-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Y. S. Davidson Á A. Robinson Á J. C. Thompson Á I. Yusuf Á H. Amin Á D. DuPlessis Á D. M. A. Mann (&) Mental Health and Neurodegeneration Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK e-mail: david.mann@manchester.ac.uk S. Raby Á P. G. Foulds Á D. Allsop Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Health and Medicine, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK S. Sikkink Á S. M. Pickering-Brown Mental Health and Neurodegeneration Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, AV Hill Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK C. Troakes Á S. Al-Sarraj London Neurodegenerative Diseases Brain Bank, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK C. Sloan Á M. M. Esiri Neuropathology Department, John Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, Level 1 West Wing, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK V. P. Prasher South Birmingham Community NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK V. P. Prasher Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK J. C. Thompson Á D. Neary Á J. S. Snowden Cerebral Function Unit, Greater Manchester Neuroscience Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK 123 Acta Neuropathol DOI 10.1007/s00401-011-0879-y