0165-4608/00/$–see front matter
PII S0165-4608(99)00236-8
Cancer Genet Cytogenet 119:83–93 (2000)
2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010
LEAD ARTICLE
Aneuploidy Precedes and Segregates with
Chemical Carcinogenesis
Peter Duesberg, Ruhong Li, David Rasnick, Charlotte Rausch,
Andreas Willer, Alwin Kraemer, George Yerganian,
and Ruediger Hehlmann
ABSTRACT: A century ago, Boveri proposed that cancer is caused by aneuploidy, an abnormal bal-
ance of chromosomes, because aneuploidy correlates with cancer and because experimental aneu-
ploidy generates “pathological” phenotypes. Half a century later, when cancers were found to be non-
clonal for aneuploidy, but clonal for somatic gene mutations, this hypothesis was abandoned. As a
result, aneuploidy is now generally viewed as a consequence, and mutated genes as a cause of cancer.
However, we have recently proposed a two-stage mechanism of carcinogenesis that resolves the dis-
crepancy between clonal mutation and nonclonal karyotypes. The proposal is as follows: in stage 1, a
carcinogen “initiates” carcinogenesis by generating a preneoplastic aneuploidy; in stage 2, aneuploidy
causes asymmetric mitosis because it biases balance-sensitive spindle and chromosomal proteins and
alters centrosomes both numerically and structurally (in proportion to the degree of aneuploidy).
Therefore, the karyotype of an initiated cell evolves autocatalytically, generating ever-new chromosome
combinations, including neoplastic ones. Accordingly, the heterogeneous karyotypes of “clonal” can-
cers are an inevitable consequence of the karyotypic instability of aneuploid cells. The notorious long
latent periods, of months to decades, from carcinogen to carcinogenesis, would reflect the low probabil-
ity of evolving by chance karyotypes that compete favorably with normal cells, in principle analagous
to natural evolution. Here, we have confirmed experimentally five predictions of the aneuploidy
hypothesis: (1) the carcinogens dimethylbenzanthracene and cytosine arabinoside induced aneuploidy
in a fraction of treated Chinese hamster embryo cells; (2) aneuploidy preceded malignant transforma-
tion; (3) transformation of carcinogen-treated cells occurred only months after carcinogen treatment,
i.e., autocatalytically; (4) preneoplastic aneuploidy segregated with malignant transformation in vitro
and with 14 of 14 tumors in animals; and (5) karyotypes of tumors were heterogeneous. We conclude
that, with the carcinogens studied, aneuploidy precedes cancer and is necessary for carcinogenesis.
© 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION
Over a century ago, asymmetric mitoses, which generate
an abnormal balance of chromosomes or aneuploidy, were
first discovered in epithelial cancer cells by Hansemann
[1]. At about the same time, aneuploidy was shown exper-
imentally to cause “pathological, lethal, and tumor-like”
phenotypes in developing sea urchin embryos by Boveri
[2]. On this basis, aneuploidy was proposed to cause can-
cer originally by Hansemann [1] and Boveri [2, 3] and then
by others up to the 1960s [4–7].
Since the 1960s, however, the aneuploidy-cancer hy-
pothesis has been abandoned by many cancer researchers
in favor of the somatic gene mutation hypothesis, prima-
rily because the cells of virtually all cancers were found to
be highly heterogeneous, i.e. nonclonal, with regard to
aneuploidy [8–13]. In the meantime, many cancers were
found to be clonal with regard to one of many kinds of so-
matic gene mutations [14–18], including those caused by
reciprocal chromosome translocations [19–21]. In view of
the clonality of the gene mutations [14, 15], the nonclonal
From the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Univer-
sity of California at Berkeley (P. D., R. L., D. R.), Berkeley, Califor-
nia, USA; the III Medizinische Klinik Mannheim of the University
of Heidelberg (P. D., C. R., A. W., A. K., R. H.), Mannheim, Ger-
many; Cytogen Research & Development (G. Y.), Boston, Massa-
chusetts, USA; and Foster Research Laboratory, Brandeis
University (G. Y.), Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dr. P. Duesberg, University of Cal-
ifornia at Berkeley, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
#3206, Room 126, 229 Stanley Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3026.
Received October 4, 1999; accepted November 2, 1999.