letters to nature
NATURE | VOL 410 | 22 MARCH 2001 | www.nature.com 453
Here, 453M(C) is a mobility, w is the so-called gradient energy coef®cient, and the
gradients are taken with respect to arc length. The ®rst term on the right-hand side
describes the chemical effect leading to phase separation within the spinodal; the second
term describes the effect that damps short-wavelength ¯uctuations. The mobility is
proportional to the surface diffusivity D
S
and is given by MC =(D
S
/k
B
T)c(1 - c). The
mobility is peaked for c = 0.5, and is zero for c = 0 and c = 1 (atoms do not diffuse in pure
phases because there are no vacancies in our model). The normal velocity is given by
v
n
C VC1 2 g-=k
B
Tk, where g is the surface free energy and V(C) is called the
interface response function, equal to the velocity of a ¯at surface covered with a
concentration C of gold. We ®nd in both simulation and experiment that the interface
response is ®tted well by the functional form V(C)= V
0
(f)exp(-C/C*), where f is the
overpotential and C* is a constant. Experimentally, the gold accumulation can be inferred
by integrating the dissolution current versus time at ®xed overpotential; it is necessary to
use an overpotential that is low enough to ensure that the surface remains planar (that is,
porosity does not form) and also to catch the short initial transient rise in current as silver
atoms are pulled from the ®rst few monolayers. This particular form for the interface
response function is quite curious. Naively, one might expect that the local interface
velocity would be proportional to the local concentration of silver exposed to the
electrolyte, that is, V(C) ~ (1 - c). However, the decaying exponential form suggests that
there is an evolving distribution of holes opening and closing within the interfacial region,
controlling the accumulation rate.
Physically, the mass conservation condition (equation (1)) is the statement that the
total number CbDs of gold atoms in a length Ds of interface with lateral width b can
change as a result of three distinct effects that correspond to the three terms on the
right-hand-side of equation (1): the accumulation of gold atoms into the interfacial
layer from the solid being dissolved; the local stretching of the interface (]Ds/]t = v
n
k
Ds), which can either increase or decrease C depending on whether the solid is concave
(k . 0) or convex (k , 0); and the motion of atoms along the interface driven by the
surface diffusion ¯ux J
S
.
Received 14 November 2000; accepted 10 January 2001.
1. Pickering, H. W. Characteristic features of alloy polarization curves. Corros. Sci. 23, 1107±1120
(1983).
2. Forty, A. J. Corrosion micromorphology of noble metal alloys and depletion gilding. Nature 282, 597±
598 (1979).
3. Masing, G. Zur Theorie der Resistenzgrenzen in Mischkristallen. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 118, 293±308
(1921).
4. Lechtman, H. Pre-Columbian surface metallurgy. Sci. Am. 250, 56±63 (1984).
5. Williams, D. E., Newman, R. C., Song, Q. & Kelly, R. G. Passivity breakdown and pitting corrosion of
binary alloys. Nature 350, 216±219 (1991).
6. Newman, R. C. & Sieradzki, K. Metallic Corrosion. Science 263, 1708±1709 (1994).
7. Li, R. & Sieradzki, K. Ductile-brittle transition in random porous Au. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1168±1171
(1992).
8. Corcoran, S. in Critical Factors in Localized Corrosion III (eds Kelly, R. G., Frankel, G. S., Natishan,
P. M. & Newman, R. C.) 500±507 (Electrochemical Society, Pennington, New Jersey, 2000).
9. Pickering, H. W. & Wagner, C. Electrolytic dissolution of binary alloys containing a noble metal.
J. Electrochem. Soc. 114, 698±706 (1967).
10. Sieradzki, K., Corderman, R. R., Shukla, K. & Newman, R. C. Computer simulations of corrosion:
selective dissolution of binary alloys. Phil. Mag. A 59, 713±746 (1989).
11. Sieradzki, K. Curvature effects in alloy dissolution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 2868±2872 (1993).
12. Wagner, C. Contribution to the theory of electropolishing. J. Electrochem. Soc.101, 225±228
(1953).
13. Erlebacher, J. in Dynamics of Crystal Surfaces and Interfaces (eds Duxbury, P. & Pence, T.) 24±28
(Plenum, New York, 1997).
14. Wagner, K., Brankovic, S. R., Dmitrov, N. & Sieradzki, K. Dealloying below the critical potential.
J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 3545±3555 (1997).
15. Cahn, J. W. & Hilliard, J. E. Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J. Chem.
Phys. 28, 258±267 (1958).
16. Cahn, J. W. & Hilliard, J. E. Free energy of a nonuniform system. III. Nucleation in a two-component
incompressible ¯uid. J. Chem. Phys. 31, 688±699 (1958).
17. Hilliard, J. E. in Solidi®cation 497±560 (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1971).
18. Ben-Jacob, E., Goldenfeld, N., Langer, J. S. & Schon, G. Dynamics of interfacial pattern formation.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1930±1932 (1983).
19. Mullins, W. W. Theory of thermal grooving. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 333±339 (1957).
20. Kessler, D. A., Koplik, J. & Levine, H. Geometrical models ofinterface evolution. II. Numerical
simulation Phys. Rev. A 30, 3161±3174 (1984).
21. Hou, T. Y., Lowengrub, J. S. & Shelley, M. J. Removing the stiffness from interfacial ¯ow with surface
tension. J. Comp. Phys. 114, 312±338 (1994).
22. Barabasi, A. -L. & Stanley, H. E. Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).
23. Haasen, P. Physical Metallurgy, (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986).
24. Forty, A. J. in Sir Charles Frank: An 80th Birthday Tribute (ed. Chamber, R .G.) 164±187 (Adam Hilger,
Bristol, 1991).
25. Tulimieri, D. J., Yoon, J. & Chan, M. H. W. Ordering of helium mixtures in porous gold. Phys. Rev. Lett.
82, 121±124 (1999).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences.
The research of A.K. also bene®ted from computer time allocation at NU-ASCC.
K.S. thanks the AFOSR for support.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.E
(e-mail: Jonah.Erlebacher@jhu.edu).
.................................................................
Ice shelves in the Pleistocene Arctic
Ocean inferred from glaciogenic
deep-sea bedforms
Leonid Polyak*, Margo H. Edwards², Bernard J. Coakley³
& Martin Jakobsson§k
* Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
² Hawaii Mapping Research Group, Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and
Planetology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
³ Department of Geology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USA
§ Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University,
106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
..............................................................................................................................................
It has been proposed that during Pleistocene glaciations, an ice
cap of 1 kilometre or greater thickness covered the Arctic
Ocean
1±3
. This notion contrasts with the prevailing view that the
Arctic Ocean was covered only by perennial sea ice with scattered
icebergs
4±6
. Detailed mapping of the ocean ¯oor is the best means
to resolve this issue. Although sea-¯oor imagery has been used to
reconstruct the glacial history of the Antarctic shelf
7±9
, little data
have been collected in the Arctic Ocean because of operational
constraints
10,11
. The use of a geophysical mapping system during
the submarine SCICEX expedition in 1999
12
provided the oppor-
tunity to perform such an investigation over a large portion of the
Arctic Ocean. Here we analyse backscatter images and sub-bottom
pro®ler records obtained during this expedition from depths as
great as 1 kilometre. These records show multiple bedforms
indicative of glacial scouring and moulding of sea ¯oor, combined
with large-scale erosion of submarine ridge crests. These distinct
glaciogenic features demonstrate that immense, Antarctic-type
ice shelves up to 1 kilometre thick and hundreds of kilometres
long existed in the Arctic Ocean during Pleistocene glaciations.
The central Arctic Ocean contains relatively shallow areas (water
depths ,1,000 m; see Fig. 1) on Yermak plateau, Lomonosov ridge
and Chukchi borderlandÐwhich includes Chukchi plateau, Chuk-
chi rise and Northwind ridge. During the SCICEX-99 expedition,
conducted on the nuclear-powered submarine USS Hawkbill,
shallow sea-¯oor areas were targeted for mapping to detect glacio-
genic bedforms. Sea-¯oor images (collected using a submarine-
mounted 12-kHz swath bathymetry and sidescan sonar
12
) from the
Chukchi borderland and the Lomonosov ridge show a variety of
bedforms, including random or subparallel scours, parallel linea-
tions, and transverse ridges. On the records from the chirp sub-
bottom pro®ler, these bedforms are associated with planed ridge
crests with rough microrelief and obvious angular unconformities
cut into the strati®ed sediments.
Randomly oriented furrows, typically ,100-m wide and up to
30-m deep, densely cover the shallowest, ,400-m-deep portions of
sea ¯oor on the Chukchi borderland and adjacent continental
margin (Fig. 2a). Isolated larger scours up to 700-m wide and
over 10-km long occur as deep as 500 m. Even greater depths,
exceeding 900 m, are attained by closely spaced, subparallel scours
on the Lomonosov ridge. Sea-¯oor scours are known to be formed
by the drift of icebergs and pack-ice ridges
13
. At present, icebergs in
the Arctic Ocean have at most 50-m draughts
14
, whereas icebergs off
Antarctica and Greenland reach depths of 500±550 m (refs 15, 16).
The largest depths of gouged sea ¯oor, extending to 850 m, have
been reported from the Yermak plateau
10
, matching the depth of
sours on the Lomonosov ridge.
Below the depth range of dense scouring, the sea ¯oor exhibits
k Present address: Center for Coastal Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire
03824, USA.
© 2001 Macmillan Magazines Ltd