Respiration Physiology 108 (1997) 241 – 246
Effects on pulmonary function of daily exposure to dry or
humidified hyperbaric oxygen
A. Shupak *, A. Abramovich, Y. Adir, I. Goldenberg, Y. Ramon, P. Halpern,
A. Ariel
Israel Naal Medical Institute, IDF Medical Corps, P.O. Box 8040, Haifa 31080, Israel
Accepted 10 March 1997
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of breathing dry or humidified hyperbaric oxygen on
pulmonary function. Pulmonary function tests were performed before and after each of 10 hyperbaric oxygen
exposures at 2.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 95 min in a group of 13 patients treated daily by hyperbaric oxygen
for problem wounds. Patients breathed dry oxygen during five successive sessions and humidified oxygen during the
remaining five. No differences were found between forced vital capacities (FVC) and maximal expiratory flows before
and after hyperbaric oxygen exposure while breathing dry or humidified oxygen. Significant differences were found
for the changes in the percentage of FVC expired in 1 s (FEV
1%
) and mean forced mid-expiratory flow rate during
the middle half of the FVC (FEF
25–75%
) on day 1 alone: decrements of 1.42 and 2.96%, respectively, under dry
oxygen, vs. increments of 3.93 and 34.4%, respectively, for humidified oxygen. Day-to-day decrements in the percent
changes in FEV
1%
and FEF
25–75%
were observed while breathing humidified hyperbaric oxygen. These results
demonstrate that repeated daily exposure to humidified hyperbaric oxygen abolishes the initial beneficial effect of
humidification on peripheral airways flow characteristics. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Function test; Dry vs. humidified hyperbaric oxygen; Humidification; Hyperbaric oxygen; Lung
1. Introduction
Repeated daily exposure to hyperbaric oxygen
(HBO) at 2.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for
90–120 min is widely employed in the combined
treatment of problem wounds (Thom, 1992). The
oxygen delivered to the patients is kept dry to
prevent corrosion and icing in the gas storage and
supply system. To reduce the risk of bronchocon-
striction due to the airway hyper-reactivity, air-
way epithelial damage and inflammation that may
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +972 4 8693040; fax: +972
4 8693240.
0034-5687/97/$17.00 © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII S00 4-5687(97)00022-4