Effects of Tesamorelin (TH9507), a Growth Hormone-
Releasing Factor Analog, in Human Immunodeficiency
Virus-Infected Patients with Excess Abdominal Fat: A
Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter, Double-Blind
Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trials with Safety
Extension Data
Julian Falutz, Jean-Claude Mamputu, Diane Potvin, Graeme Moyle,
Graziella Soulban, Helen Loughrey, Christian Marsolais, Ralph Turner,
and Steven Grinspoon*
Context: HIV patients treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) often develop increased visceral
adipose tissue (VAT).
Objective: Our objective was to perform a pooled analysis of two phase-3 studies of tesamorelin
in ART-treated HIV patients with excess abdominal fat.
Design and Setting: Two multicenter, international studies were conducted; a 26-wk randomized,
placebo-controlled primary intervention phase was followed by a 26-wk safety extension.
Patients: A total of 806 ART-treated HIV patients with excess abdominal fat were randomized in a 2:1
fashion to receive tesamorelin 2 mg (n = 543) or placebo (n = 263) sc daily. At wk 26, patients initially
on tesamorelin were rerandomized to 2 mg tesamorelin (T-T group, n = 246) or placebo (T-P, n = 135)
for an additional 26 wk, whereas patients on placebo were switched to tesamorelin (P-T, n = 197).
Interventions: Tesamorelin (GHRH
1– 44
) at a dose of 2 mg or identical placebo, sc, was given daily.
Main Outcome Measure: We evaluated percent change in VAT by computed tomography scan at wk 26.
Results: At wk 26, VAT decreased significantly in tesamorelin-treated patients (-24 41 vs. 2 35 cm
2
,
tesamorelin vs. placebo, P 0.001; treatment effect, -15.4%). No significant changes were observed
in abdominal sc adipose tissue (-2 32 vs. 2 29 cm
2
, P = 0.08; treatment effect, -0.6%). Treatment
with tesamorelin resulted in significant decreases in triglycerides (-37 139 vs. 6 112 mg/dl, P
0.001; treatment effect, -12.3%) and cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein ratio (-0.18 1.00 vs.
0.18 0.94, P 0.001; treatment effect, -7.2%) vs. placebo. Tesamorelin improved body image [belly
appearance distress (P = 0.002)], patient rating of belly profile (P = 0.003), and physician rating of belly
profile (P 0.001). Mean IGF-I increased 108 112 vs.-7 64 ng/ml (P 0.001 vs. placebo). At wk 52,
decreases in VAT -35 50 cm
2
(-17.5 23.3%), waist circumference (-3.4 6.0 cm), triglycerides
(-48 182 mg/dl), cholesterol (-8 38 mg/dl), and non-high-density lipoprotein (-7 38 mg/dl) were
maintained (all P 0.001 vs. original baseline) in the T-T group. Treatment with tesamorelin was
generally well tolerated. No clinically meaningful differences were observed between groups in glu-
cose parameters at wk 26 and 52.
Conclusions: Treatment with tesamorelin reduces VAT and maintains the reduction for up to 52 wk,
preserves abdominal sc adipose tissue, improves body image and lipids, and is overall well tolerated without
clinically meaningful changes in glucose parameters. ( J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 0000 – 0000, 2010)
ISSN Print 0021-972X ISSN Online 1945-7197
Printed in U.S.A.
Copyright © 2010 by The Endocrine Society
doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0490 Received March 1, 2010. Accepted May 24, 2010.
* Author Affiliations are shown at the bottom of the next page.
Abbreviations: AE, Adverse event; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; ART, antiretroviral
therapy; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HbA
1c
, glycated hemoglobin; HDL,
high-density lipoprotein; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; IFG, impaired fasting glu-
cose; SAE, serious AE; SAT, sc adipose tissue; SDS, SD score; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Endocrine Care
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, September 2010, 95(9):0000 – 0000 jcem.endojournals.org 1
J Clin Endocrin Metab. First published ahead of print June 16, 2010 as doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0490
Copyright (C) 2010 by The Endocrine Society