Appendix to: Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI Koen van Turnhout, Arthur Bennis, Sabine Craenmehr, Robert Holwerda, Marjolein Jacobs, Ralph Niels, Lambert Zaad, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Dick Lenior, René Bakker. HAN University of Applied Sciences Academy of Information Technology and Communication [Koen.vanTurnhout, Arthur.Bennis, Sabine.Craenmehr, Robert.Holwerda, Marjolein.Jacobs, Ralph.Niels, Lambert.Zaad, Stijn.Hoppenbrouwers, Dick.Lenior, Rene.Bakker] @ han.nl ABSTRACT In this appendix we present the full reference list and classification results of our empirical literature study as presented in the paper Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI [a]. INTRODUCTION In ‘Design Patterns for Mixed-Method Research in HCI’ we presented an empirical literature study of an a-select sample of 40 papers taken from the NordiChi 2012 proceedings. This appendix lists our full. The set of papers was classified in to three fully described patterns and three ‘candidate patters’ which were only delineated. Table 1 lists the division of papers across (candidate) patterns as presented in [a]. Table 1: Patterns which were found Number of papers Validated Solution 11 Field Reframing 10 Rigor Cycle 9 Parameter Discovery 4 Transformative Design 3 Relevance Cycle 1 Unclassified 2 CLASSIFICATION RESULTS In this section we present the full classification results of the empirical literature study. We have chosen to group the reference papers according to the pattern to which they were assigned. Some combine multiple patterns or execute a study which is not part of the pattern in the strict sense of definition. These are listed in the column ‘combination’. What follows is a listing of the results. Table 2 lists papers classified as Validated Solution; Table 3 lists papers classified as Field Reframing; Table 4 lists papers classified as Rigor Cycle; Table 5 lists papers classified as Parameter Discovery; Table 6 lists papers classified as Transformative Design; Table 7 lists the paper classified as Relevance Cycle; Table 8 lists the unclassified papers. Table 2: Papers classified as Validated Solution VALIDATED SOLUTION Reference Combination 1 Alt et al [1] with Showroom 2 Ardito et al [3] 3 Dalsgaard & Halskov [9] with Showroom 4 Freitag et al [12] 5 Hansen et al [19] with Showroom 6 Harris [20] 7 Honkala & Yanqing [21] 8 McGookin et al [30] with Showroom 9 Medhi et al [31] 10 Rodil et al [34] 11 Veen et al [39] Table 3: Papers classified as Field Reframing FIELD REFRAMING Reference Combination 1 Blythe et al [4] with Workshop, without Showroom 2 Brown et al [5] 3 Følstad et al [11] 4 Giusti et al [13] with Lab 5 Gonçalves et al [14] with Lab 6 Grubert et al [16] with Validated Solution 7 Häkkilä et al [17] without Showroom 8 Kinnula et al [24] 9 Kuusinen et al [26] without Showroom 10 Nylander [32]