“Racism just isn't an issue anymore”: Preservice teachers' resistances
to the intersections of sexuality and race
Stephanie Anne Shelton
a, *
, Meghan E. Barnes
b
a
The University of Alabama, Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling Department, 306 Carmichael Hall, Tuscaloosa, AL
35487, USA
b
The University of Georgia, Language and Literacy Education Department, 315 Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA
highlights
We examine race in relation to sexuality.
Participants historicized race and contemporized sexuality.
Participants resisted intersecting race with sexuality.
Intersectionality is essential to teacher education.
article info
Article history:
Received 24 April 2015
Received in revised form
10 December 2015
Accepted 8 January 2016
Available online xxx
Keywords:
Preservice teachers
Race
Intersectionality
LGBTQ
abstract
Through year-long focus group interviews with members of a secondary English Education cohort this
paper considers both 1) participants' understandings of sexuality and race and 2) how participants'
understandings of sexuality and race shaped their interactions with one another. Themes established
through data analysis suggested that 1) participants maintained positioned racism as an historical issue
that contrasted with the contemporaneity of LGBTQ issues; 2) participants resisted intersecting race and
sexuality; 3) participants silenced Andy, the only queer student of color, when she argued for the
intersectionality of race and sexuality.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
This research's setting is the Southeastern United States, a re-
gion that includes those states “South of [the] Mason-Dixon Line
and Ohio River, from [the] western Texas border to the Atlantic
Ocean” (Library of Congress, n.d.). Historically, the region has been
associated with politically and socially conservative policies,
including state-supported resistances to racial desegregation and
lawmakers' longstanding oppositions to women's rights (Sanabria,
2012; Whitlock, 2010). We will use the terms “South” and
“Southern” throughout the paper in reference to this region.
The South has a history of resisting LGBTQ legal protections.
Nearly all of the states that prohibited same-sex marriages prior to
the Supreme Court's historical ruling on marriage equality were in
this region (Human Rights Campaign, 2014), and in comparison to
the rest of the U.S., no Southern state offers what The Guardian
refers to as “maximum protection” for LGBTQ Americans, including
equal employment protections and safeties from gender- and
sexuality-based harassment inside state-funded schools (Guardian
Interactive, 2012). Specifically in Southern schools, the 2012 Gay,
Lesbian, & Straight Education Network's (GLSEN) nationwide study
determined that “[a]s bad as bullying can be at all schools, it seems
to be amplified in the South” (n.p.). Researchers attributed the
finding to Southern cultural beliefs, which contribute to a lack of
public support and resources for LGBTQ populations (2012). Given
this environment, Southern LGBTQ students are especially vulner-
able (Whitlock, 2010).
In this context, the first author taught a secondary education
methods course for pre-service teachers at a Southeastern
research-intensive university. During a class discussion on LGBTQ
issues in the secondary classroom, a student asked how she might
address her mentor teacher's reluctance to address gay-bashing in
a socio-politically conservative school. Several other students
raised their hands with related questions, consistently stating that
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: stepshel@uga.edu (S.A. Shelton), meghan824@gmail.com
(M.E. Barnes).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Teaching and Teacher Education
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tate
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.008
0742-051X/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Teaching and Teacher Education 55 (2016) 165e174