N
1
-(3-Cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N
2
-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-
yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57), a Potent Partial Agonist for the
Human Histamine H
1
- and H
2
- Receptors
Sheng-Xue Xie, Anja Kraus, Prasanta Ghorai, Qi-Zhuang Ye, Sigurd Elz, Armin Buschauer,
and Roland Seifert
High-Throughput Screening Laboratory (S.-X.X., Q.-Z.Y.) and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology (R.S.), The
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas; and Department of Medicinal Chemistry II (A.K., P.G., A.B.), Department of Medicinal
Chemistry I (S.E.), and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology (R.S.), University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Received February 13, 2006; accepted March 17, 2006
ABSTRACT
Both the histamine H
1
-receptor (H
1
R) and H
2
-receptor (H
2
R)
exhibit pronounced species selectivity in their pharmacological
properties; i.e., bulky agonists possess higher potencies and
efficacies at guinea pig (gp) than at the corresponding human
(h) receptor isoforms. In this study, we examined the effects of
N
G
-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines substituted with a sin-
gle phenyl or cyclohexyl substituent on H
1
R and H
2
R spe-
cies isoforms expressed in Sf9 insect cells. N
1
-(3-Cyclohexyl-
butanoyl)-N
2
-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57)
turned out to be the most potent hH
2
R agonist identified so far
(EC
50
of 23 nM in the GTPase assay at the hH
2
R-G
s
fusion
protein expressed in Sf9 insect cells). UR-AK57 was almost a
full-hH
2
R agonist and only slightly less potent and efficacious
than at gpH
2
R-G
s
. Several N
G
-acylated imidazolylpropylgua-
nidines showed similar potency at hH
2
R and gpH
2
R. Most
unexpectedly, UR-AK57 exhibited moderately strong partial
hH
1
R agonism with a potency similar to that of histamine,
whereas at gpH
1
R, UR-AK57 was only a very weak partial
agonist. Structure/activity relationship studies revealed that
both the alkanoyl chain connecting the aromatic or alicyclic
substituent with the guanidine moiety and the nature of the
carbocycle (cyclohexyl versus phenyl ring) critically determine
the pharmacological properties of this class of compounds.
Collectively, our data show that gpH
1
R and gpH
2
R do not
necessarily exhibit preference for bulky agonists compared
with hH
1
R and hH
2
R, respectively, and that UR-AK57 is a
promising starting point for the development of both potent and
efficacious hH
1
R and hH
2
R agonists.
Histamine (HIS) (1) (see Fig. 1) is a neurotransmitter and
autacoid and acts through H
1
-, H
2
-, H
3
-, and H
4
-receptors
(H
1
R–H
4
R) (Hill et al., 1997; Hough, 2001; Bakker et al.,
2002). The H
1
R couples to G
q
-proteins to mediate phospho-
lipase C activation and plays a role in the regulation of
alertness and as mediator of type 1 allergic reactions (Hill et
al., 1997; Bakker et al., 2002). The H
2
R couples to G
s
-pro-
teins to mediate adenylyl cyclase activation and regulates H
+
secretion in gastric parietal cells, cardiac contractility, and
various myeloid cell functions (Klinker et al., 1996; Hill et al.,
1997; Bakker et al., 2002).
It has been difficult to establish relevant native test sys-
tems for the analysis of the human H
1
R (hH
1
R) and human
H
2
R (hH
2
R), because there are unexplained pharmacological
differences in the properties of hH
1
R and hH
2
R in native cells
relative to standard guinea pig test organs (Burde et al.,
1990; Seifert et al., 1994; Klinker et al., 1996). To facilitate
the comparison of histamine receptors under identical exper-
imental conditions, we established expression systems for
the H
1
R and H
2
R in Sf9 insect cells (Kelley et al., 2001;
Houston et al., 2002). Sf9 cells express the H
1
R and H
2
R at
high levels and can be cultured in large quantities. GPCR/G-
protein coupling in Sf9 membranes is monitored with high
sensitivity using the steady-state GTPase assay. This assay
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health COBRE
Award 1 P20 RR15563 and matching support from the State of Kansas and the
University of Kansas (to R.S. and Q.-Z.Y.) and the Graduate Training Program
(Graduiertenkolleg GRK 760, “Medicinal Chemistry: Molecular Recognition—
Ligand-Receptor Interactions”) of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to
R.S., S.E., and A.B.).
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
doi:10.1124/jpet.106.102897.
ABBREVIATIONS: HIS, histamine; UR-AK57, N
1
-(3-cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N
2
-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine; AIPG, N
G
-acylated imidazolyl-
propylguanidine; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; gpH
1
R, guinea pig histamine H
1
-receptor; gpH
2
R, guinea pig histamine H
2
-receptor;
gpH
2
R-G
sS
, fusion protein of the guinea pig histamine H
2
-receptor and the short splice variant of G
s
; hH
1
R, human histamine H
1
-receptor; hH
2
R,
human histamine H
2
-receptor; hH
2
R-G
sS
, fusion protein of the human histamine H
2
-receptor and the short splice variant of G
s
; HIS, histamine;
RGS, regulator of G-protein signaling; TM, transmembrane domain.
0022-3565/06/3173-1262–1268$20.00
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Vol. 317, No. 3
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 102897/3117058
JPET 317:1262–1268, 2006 Printed in U.S.A.
1262
at ASPET Journals on February 2, 2016 jpet.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from