Fax +41 61 306 12 34
E-Mail karger@karger.ch
www.karger.com
Innovations
Psychother Psychosom 2006;75:25–39
DOI: 10.1159/000089224
The Development of the Toronto Structured
Interview for Alexithymia: Item Selection,
Factor Structure, Reliability and Concurrent
Validity
R. Michael Bagby
a, b
Graeme J. Taylor
a, c
James D.A. Parker
d
Susan E. Dickens
b
a
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto,
b
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health,
c
Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, and
d
Department of Psychology,
Trent University, Peterborough, Canada
tural configuration resulted in the Toronto Structured
Interview for Alexithymia (TSIA) with two domain scales
and four facet scales. The TSIA and its six scales demon-
strated acceptable levels of interrater, internal, and retest
reliability. The TSIA and its scales correlated modestly
but significantly with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia
Scale and its three factor scales, providing some support
for the concurrent validity of this interview. Conclusion:
The TSIA appears to be a promising structured interview
for assessing alexithymia.
Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
Introduction
The alexithymia construct, as formulated by Nemiah
et al. [1], encompasses difficulties in identifying and de-
scribing subjective emotional feelings and an operative
thinking style (pensée opératoire), which is characterized
by ‘an absence or paucity of fantasies referable to drives
and feelings, and … a preoccupation with the details of
external events’ (p. 433). Although the construct was de-
rived from clinical observations in the early 1970s [2] , for
many years research evaluating the construct and its pur-
ported association with various medical and psychiatric
Key Words
Alexithymia Toronto Structured Interview for
Alexithymia Toronto Alexithymia Scale Concurrent
validity
Abstract
Background: Assessments of personality constructs in-
creasingly use self-report and structured interview in-
struments, which allow for a multimethod measurement
approach and decrease specific measurement method
bias. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and
reliable structured interview for assessing the alexi-
thymia construct. Methods: Sixty interview questions
were written initially, each with a set of scoring criteria
and prompts and probes to elicit information assisting
in the scoring of the respondents’ answers. Results: After
pilot testing, the number of questions was reduced to 43,
which were administered to 136 community participants
and 97 psychiatric outpatients. A series of item and scale
analyses further reduced the item pool to 24 items. Prin-
cipal component analysis and confirmatory factor analy-
sis of these 24 items revealed preliminary evidence of a
hierarchical, four-factor structure, with four lower factors
nested within two higher-order latent factors. This struc-
R. Michael Bagby, PhD, C. Psych.
Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, College Street Site
250 College Street
Toronto, Ont. M5T 1R8 (Canada)
Tel. +1 416 535 8501, ext. 6939, Fax +1 416 260 4125, E-Mail michael_bagby@camh.net
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
0033–3190/06/0751–0025$23.50/0
Accessible online at:
www.karger.com/pps