Can yeast isolation in peritoneal fluid be predicted in intensive
care unit patients with peritonitis?*
Hervé Dupont, MD; Agnes Bourichon; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Jean Mantz; Jean-Marie Desmonts
D
espite constant improvement
in the standard of intensive
care unit (ICU) care over the
last 20 yrs, mortality attrib-
uted to severe intraabdominal sepsis re-
mains as high as 40% (1). A prominent
feature of peritonitis requiring intensive
care is the frequency of polymicrobial
flora recovered from peritoneal fluid. The
presence of intraperitoneal yeast is de-
tected in 5% to 22% of cases in this
setting (1– 4). Interestingly, the presence
of yeast as a causative agent of peritonitis
has been reported to be associated with
an increased overall mortality rate as
high as 60% to 70% (5). The reason for
this extremely high mortality associated
with fungal peritonitis has not yet been
elucidated.
Inadequate early antimicrobial ther-
apy has been associated with a poorer
outcome in critically ill patients with
peritonitis (1). In the ICU, 17% of noso-
comial isolates are yeasts, as reported in
the European Prevalence of Infection in
Intensive Care study (6). However, only
half of the patients were treated by anti-
fungal therapy in this study, essentially
because of the lack of consensus concern-
ing the pathogenicity of yeast recovered
from bacteriologic samples. This is par-
ticularly true when yeast is isolated from
the urinary tract or specimens are ob-
tained from protected pulmonary sam-
ples. Similarly, the pathogenicity of yeast
in peritoneal fluid also remains contro-
versial (7). In the recently published
practice guidelines for the treatment of
candidiasis, antifungal therapy was rec-
ommended for documented peritoneal di-
alysis catheter yeast infections and peri-
tonitis related to intraabdominal leakage
of fecal material. Surgical repair and
drainage are also recommended in this
case (8).
Although risk factors for candidemia
have been extensively described (9, 10),
no data are available yet on the risk
factors for developing fungal peritoni-
tis. The aim of this study was first to
determine independent risk factors of
yeast isolation in peritoneal fluid of ICU
patients with severe peritonitis and sec-
ond to generate and validate a predic-
tive score of yeast isolation in this
patient subpopulation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient Selection. A retrospective study in-
cluding all adult patients with a diagnosis of
peritonitis requiring admission to a surgical
ICU for organ failure was performed between
1994 and 1999. All consecutive patients in
whom peritonitis was diagnosed were prospec-
tively included in a database and their charts
were reviewed retrospectively. Peritonitis was
diagnosed on the basis of both macroscopic
findings and positive culture of peritoneal
fluid collected during an operation. The exclu-
sion criteria were acute infected pancreatitis,
acute perforation caused by trauma 6 hrs,
and primary peritonitis, such as dialysis cath-
eter infection and ascites infection. A prospec-
tive validation cohort of ICU patients with the
same diagnosis was also evaluated in 2000.
Surgery. The surgical management of se-
vere peritonitis was based on three fundamen-
tal principles (11). The first one was the elim-
ination of the source of infection, the second
one the reduction of bacterial inoculum of the
peritoneal cavity, and the third one the pre-
vention of persistent or recurrent intraab-
dominal infection. The source control was
performed through midline laparotomy for all
patients. Primary anastomosis was not per-
formed and enterostomy preferred. The sec-
*See also p. 976.
From the Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale,
Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Copyright © 2003 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000053525.49267.77
Objective: To generate and validate a predictive score of yeast
isolation based on independent risk factors of yeast isolation in
intensive care unit patients with peritonitis.
Design: Retrospective cohort study to determine independent
risk factors of yeast isolation, generation of the score, and vali-
dation in a prospective cohort of patients with peritonitis.
Setting: Tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital.
Patients: Two hundred twenty-one patients with peritonitis
hospitalized in a surgical intensive care unit between 1994 and
1999 for the retrospective cohort and 57 patients in the prospec-
tive cohort (2000).
Measurements and Main Results: Four independent risk fac-
tors of yeast isolation in peritoneal fluid (similar odds ratio) were
found in the retrospective cohort: female gender, upper gastro-
intestinal tract origin of peritonitis, intraoperative cardiovascular
failure, and previous antimicrobial therapy at least 48 hrs before
the onset of peritonitis. A score based on the number of risk
factors was constructed (grade A zero or one risk factor, grade
B at least two risk factors, grade C at least three risk factors,
and grade D four risk factors), and validated in the prospective
cohort. For a grade C score, sensitivity was 84%, specificity was
50%, positive and negative predictive values were 67% and 72%,
respectively, and overall accuracy was 71%.
Conclusions: Four independent risk factors of yeast isolation
in the peritoneal fluid were identified in critically ill surgical
patients with peritonitis. The presence of at least three of these
factors (grade C score) was associated with a high rate of
yeast detection. This approach could be helpful to initiate early
antifungal therapy in this patient population. (Crit Care Med
2003; 31:752–757)
KEY WORDS: peritonitis; Candida; risk factors; score; intensive
care
752 Crit Care Med 2003 Vol. 31, No. 3