Review of International Studies (1999), 25, 655–673 Copyright © British International Studies Association
655
1
The author would like to acknowledge the financial assistance of the Arts Faculty of University
College Cork, which greatly facilitated the research and writing of this article.
Ideology, calculation, and improvisation:
spheres of influence and Soviet foreign policy
1939–1945
GEOFFREY ROBERTS
1
Abstract.This article examines Soviet foreign policy during the Second World War in the light
of new evidence from the Russian archives. It highlights the theme of spheres of influence and
the relationship between the pursuit of this goal by the USSR and the outbreak of the Cold
War. It argues that the Cold War was the result of an attempt by Moscow to harmonise
spheres of influence and postwar cooperation with Britain and the United States with the
ideological project of a people’s democratic Europe.
Introduction
For the USSR the Second World War was an economic and human catastrophe of
gigantic proportions. Politically and militarily, however, the war presented Moscow
with a series of opportunities to achieve one of the main foreign goals of the Soviet
state: the security of the socialist system. The chosen means to achieve this goal was
the establishment of a sphere of influence in Eastern and Central Europe—a zone of
Soviet strategic and political predominance unchallenged by any other great power.
If there was one single underlying and persistent theme of Soviet foreign policy
during the war it was to create a series of friendly regimes on the USSR’s western
flank. Initially this goal was sought in the context of an alliance with Nazi Germany.
Following the Nazi attack on the USSR in June 1941, Moscow then attempted to
conclude a broad-based, pan-European spheres of influence agreement with its new
British ally. That most famed Soviet spheres of influence deal—the Churchill-Stalin
‘percentages agreement’ of October 1944—was more mythical than real, but in the
middle years of the war Soviet officials did formulate grandiose plans for a postwar
trilateral global condominium of Great Britain, the USSR and the United States.
Nor was there anything imaginary about Soviet insistence at the end of the war on a
military and political zone of Soviet security in Eastern Europe. In the event,
however, this latter goal was achieved not through diplomacy, but by a combination
of force of arms and local communist political mobilisation and manipulation. The
culmination of this drive for security through spheres of influence was, ultimately, a
Soviet-dominated and a communist-controlled Eastern Europe.
The expansion of Soviet influence and control in Eastern Europe has appeared to
many historians as a purposeful and coherent pattern of territorial and political
expansion. But there were a number of different phases of Soviet spheres of