Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Type A Toxin (Dysport) in
Cervical Dystonia: Results of the First US Randomized,
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
Daniel Truong, MD,
1
*
Drake D. Duane, MD,
2
Joseph Jankovic, MD,
3
Carlos Singer, MD,
4
Lauren C. Seeberger, MD,
5
Cynthia L. Comella, MD,
6
Mark F. Lew, MD,
7
Robert L. Rodnitzky, MD,
8
Fabio O. Danisi, MD,
9
James P. Sutton, MD,
10
P. David Charles, MD,
11
Robert A. Hauser, MD,
12
and Geoffrey L. Sheean, MD
13
1
The Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders Institute, Fountain Valley, California, USA
2
Arizona Dystonia Institute, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
3
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
4
University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
5
Colorado Neurological Institute, Englewood, Colorado, USA
6
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
7
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
8
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
9
Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
10
Neurological Research Institute, Encino, California, USA
11
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
12
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
13
University of California, San Diego, California, USA
Abstract: Botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) has been shown in
European studies to be a safe and effective treatment for
cervical dystonia. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized,
controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of Dysport in
cervical dystonia patients in the United States. Eighty patients
were randomly assigned to receive one treatment with Dysport
(500 units) or placebo. Participants were followed up for 4 to
20 weeks, until they needed further treatment. They were
assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 after
treatment. Dysport was significantly more efficacious than pla-
cebo at weeks 4, 8, and 12 as assessed by the Toronto Western
Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (10-point vs. 3.8-point re-
duction in total score, respectively, at week 4; P 0.013). Of
participants in the Dysport group, 38% showed positive treat-
ment response, compared to 16% in the placebo group (95%
confidence interval, 0.02– 0.41). The median duration of re-
sponse to Dysport was 18.5 weeks. Side effects were generally
similar in the two treatment groups; only blurred vision and
weakness occurred significantly more often with Dysport. No
participants in the Dysport group converted from negative to
positive antibodies after treatment. These results confirm pre-
vious reports that Dysport (500 units) is safe, effective, and
well-tolerated in patients with cervical dystonia. © 2005 Move-
ment Disorder Society
Key words: cervical dystonia; spasmodic torticollis; botuli-
num toxin; Dysport; clinical trial
Focal dystonias are abnormal contractions of muscles
leading to abnormal postures. The overactivity of mus-
cles characteristic of focal dystonia is thought to be
mediated by a neurophysiological disturbance in the
basal ganglia and/or brainstem.
1,2
Cervical dystonia is
the most common type of focal dystonia encountered in
neurological practice, with a prevalence of eighty-nine
affected patients per one million individuals.
3
It is char-
acterized by sustained involuntary contractions of the
cervical muscles, often leading to painful and disabling
neck spasms and abnormal head positions. Rotation (tor-
*Correspondence to: Dr. Daniel Truong, The Parkinson’s and Move-
ment Disorders Institute, 9940 Talbert Avenue #204, Fountain Valley,
CA 92708. E-mail: dtruong@pmdi.org
Received 12 December 2003; Revised 20 May 2004; Accepted 20
July 2004
Published online 25 February 2005 in Wiley InterScience (www.
interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mds.20403
Movement Disorders
Vol. 20, No. 7, 2005, pp. 783–791
© 2005 Movement Disorder Society
783